Mark Stryker Posted November 1, 2023 Report Posted November 1, 2023 Cover story in the latest issue of the Nation. https://www.thenation.com/article/culture/louis-armstrong-archive/?fbclid=IwAR39LE3RrJpq2a89Bru-6g3m8DExnVyEPuL_6-Qr4ADPNfcxl94od-x1e3w Quote
AllenLowe Posted November 1, 2023 Report Posted November 1, 2023 1 hour ago, Mark Stryker said: Cover story in the latest issue of the Nation. https://www.thenation.com/article/culture/louis-armstrong-archive/?fbclid=IwAR39LE3RrJpq2a89Bru-6g3m8DExnVyEPuL_6-Qr4ADPNfcxl94od-x1e3w Ethan peruses this site regularly, and then gets mad when I don't defend him. So in case he is watching, let me say I intend to read this article and enjoy it, whether I like it or not. Quote
AllenLowe Posted November 1, 2023 Report Posted November 1, 2023 (edited) I have read it, very nice piece. The ONLY thing I would suggest is that, even after all of these years, there is a somewhat misguided sense of Armstrong's importance as a great innovator of melody and rhythm - which he was; but I think his innovations, especially in the early years - 1925-1940 - are much more radically modernist, as I have posted before. He was, accidentally or not, exactly in tune with the new modernism of Dada, of Joyce, of new theater like King Ubu. His was a radical restructuring of traditional and recognizable elements, ingenious reordered so that the effect was of something both strange and familiar at the same time - Edited November 1, 2023 by AllenLowe Quote
Dub Modal Posted November 2, 2023 Report Posted November 2, 2023 I’m not a fan of Iverson’s blog or most of his writing but this was a solid article. Likely credit due to The Nation’s editor. Thanks for the link Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.