Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Hey ...I kinda like this...when I cruise the site at night you guys are usually just home or working and sober but its in reverse now

and its not fair

but to think you have been sat that with the munchies, chopping and drinking and can get back to bed...I have to get back to work now...

:crazy:

Posted

oh god ......please don't tell me you are another victim of beer and candy corns...keep yer voice down as we only just managed to sedate the other guy

...is this still just a region problem ie only in the us or over here in Yurp

i had the passing ships through and that was copy protected but I cannot remember where that came from.

I will have a look into it when I get home but that will be a pain in my rear too as I will not be able to hum some ditties on the way to work on my bike with my mp3 doofer.

:(

Andy

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I recently bought a few Connoisseurs ("Elmo Hope Trio & Quartet", "Booker Ervin - Tex Book Tenor" & "Ike Quebec - Complete Blue Note 45 Sessions", all released in 2005, all European EMI/Blue Note issues), that I found quite cheap (probably misspriced) in some Spanish megastore.

Surprised to see that the Elmo Hope was not copy-protected, while the other two were (as every new Blue Note CD I´ve seen round here in the last two or three years).

Could anybody bring some light on this?

Posted

I recently bought a few Connoisseurs ("Elmo Hope Trio & Quartet", "Booker Ervin - Tex Book Tenor" & "Ike Quebec - Complete Blue Note 45 Sessions", all released in 2005, all European EMI/Blue Note issues), that I found quite cheap (probably misspriced) in some Spanish megastore.

Surprised to see that the Elmo Hope was not copy-protected, while the other two were (as every new Blue Note CD I´ve seen round here in the last two or three years).

Could anybody bring some light on this?

What's the duration? The most most recent Lee Morgan Conn ("Sonic Boom") was not copy-crapped due to long duration - seems that discs of a certain lenght (76? 77 minutes?) cannot be released in crappy versions for lack of space on the disc.

Posted

I recently bought a few Connoisseurs ("Elmo Hope Trio & Quartet", "Booker Ervin - Tex Book Tenor" & "Ike Quebec - Complete Blue Note 45 Sessions", all released in 2005, all European EMI/Blue Note issues), that I found quite cheap (probably misspriced) in some Spanish megastore.

Surprised to see that the Elmo Hope was not copy-protected, while the other two were (as every new Blue Note CD I´ve seen round here in the last two or three years).

Could anybody bring some light on this?

What's the duration? The most most recent Lee Morgan Conn ("Sonic Boom") was not copy-crapped due to long duration - seems that discs of a certain lenght (76? 77 minutes?) cannot be released in crappy versions for lack of space on the disc.

Probably this is the case, Flurin. Can´t give exact running time now, but it´s surely over 75 minutes.

Thanks!

Posted

I wonder if copy control increases profits? That would be the only reason to do it. Notably in the UK the introduction of CC on Blue Note titles was accompanied by a price cut on RVG titles (Conns are still extortionate though). If the introduction of CC actually increases profits it will never go away.

Posted

I wonder if copy control increases profits? That would be the only reason to do it. Notably in the UK the introduction of CC on Blue Note titles was accompanied by a price cut on RVG titles (Conns are still extortionate though). If the introduction of CC actually increases profits it will never go away.

I believe it is more a case that this gives a false sense of security for music execs. Just like the public wants the illusion of security, even if the practical impact is zilch. How can CC increase profits when the CC on these particular Blue Notes can be broken in under 15 seconds? Anyone can beat it, and in fact I just ripped 6 of these CDs last night. Believe me I hate CC, since it mucks up CDs but this is so weak and anemic that I don't let it stop me from buying the music out of principle.

Posted

I wonder if copy control increases profits? That would be the only reason to do it. Notably in the UK the introduction of CC on Blue Note titles was accompanied by a price cut on RVG titles (Conns are still extortionate though). If the introduction of CC actually increases profits it will never go away.

I believe it is more a case that this gives a false sense of security for music execs. Just like the public wants the illusion of security, even if the practical impact is zilch. How can CC increase profits when the CC on these particular Blue Notes can be broken in under 15 seconds? Anyone can beat it, and in fact I just ripped 6 of these CDs last night. Believe me I hate CC, since it mucks up CDs but this is so weak and anemic that I don't let it stop me from buying the music out of principle.

I hear you! If it damages profits of course we may see it be withdrawn...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...