JSngry Posted May 22, 2023 Report Posted May 22, 2023 You've done nothing improper. It was Larry who made the error Quote
Larry Kart Posted May 22, 2023 Author Report Posted May 22, 2023 10 hours ago, JSngry said: Bad guys or ignorant? I am in no way qualified to speak to or about other peoples' consciences. Their intellects will speak for itselves over time. It - the record in question - was a Latin-ish date to begin with, and certainly had commercial/crossover ambitions (just look at that cover photo!!!) . Those are mostly all studio players, which is where Cuber was living at the time. You get studio players to make a studio record, you get a studio record, for better and for worse. As such, it did what it wanted to do in the way it was to have been done. In no way is it supposed to be a "straight jazz record". It's got an Eddie Palmieri cover for crying out loud! And a tune called Fajardo. Cuber was pretty well known in Latin circles, not just jazz. And Ronnie Cuber had no problems making commercial records. None. Zero. Zilch. Nada. Not only was the scene clean, so was his conscience (it certainly seems!) "Jazz fans" can be horribly parochial about stuff like that sometimes. So if you buy this record expecting a Steeplechase-type affair, you might not be ignorant, but you will be woefully uninformed as to why you expectations were not met. It's the guitarist that bugs me, to be honest. Never did care for him. Not in BS&T, not with Joe Henderson, not in the SNL band (which I think is where both him and Cuber were gigging at the time). Never. Oh, please be careful. You meant to quote me, but instead you edited me. Otherwise, FAJARDOI!!! Based on my somewhat partial experience of Latin percussion supporting and/or interweaving with a jazz soloist, if it had been, say, Ray Baretto and friends, everyone would have been happy, including me. What fooled me initially was the album title, a great Dameron tune, I went right to the track and thought "meh" -- what's with all this seemingly non-functional tuned percussion "interference?" so to speak. Quote
JSngry Posted May 22, 2023 Report Posted May 22, 2023 He was doing what the gig called for, and doing it well. Quote
Mark Stryker Posted May 22, 2023 Report Posted May 22, 2023 FWIW, I reviewed this record positively when it came out specifically for the Latin rhythmic flavorings, breezy melodicism, party vibe and the rehearsed and focused sound of the band. Cuber's spirit is undeniable no matter what is going on around him, but I also like what's going on around him here and how he relates to it. Of course, everyone's mileage can and will vary and that's fine. I still play this record on occasion and always enjoy it when I do. Quote
JSngry Posted May 22, 2023 Report Posted May 22, 2023 1 hour ago, Mark Stryker said: FWIW, I reviewed this record positively when it came out specifically for the Latin rhythmic flavorings, breezy melodicism, party vibe and the rehearsed and focused sound of the band. Cuber's spirit is undeniable no matter what is going on around him, but I also like what's going on around him here and how he relates to it. Of course, everyone's mileage can and will vary and that's fine. I still play this record on occasion and always enjoy it when I do. Exactly. It's a record for a more "general" audience/application. One might dare say "commercial"!!!!!! Quote
Larry Kart Posted May 22, 2023 Author Report Posted May 22, 2023 3 hours ago, JSngry said: Exactly. It's a record for a more "general" audience/application. One might dare say "commercial"!!!!!! I'm in the "ungeneral" audience category by and large and am not ashamed of it, if only because I respond to many topnotch recordings that are or seem to be in the general audience category. Life is like that. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.