Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Looks like a nice player. Half price is a good deal.

Back when I did audio comparisons, I never really heard CD player differences. I heard mastering differences from CD to CD, but I can't remember a player making a certain CD sound good in one player and worse in another. I did use certain CDs to compare speakers though. I would just recommend using some favorites and see how they sound. You should have a few CDs that you know every note - for me it would CDs like "Kind of Blue", "Blue Train" or "Soul Station". I would use something like this.

Posted (edited)

I've heard differences between players and transports and as a general rule I'd say you get what you pay for. Congrats! Seems like a great player.

I like to use Antônio Carlos Jobim "Stone Flower" (either the Japanese RVG UHQCD or the King Jazz Blu-Spec CD) and Duke Ellington "Indigos" (Impex Gold cd) and Duke Ellington "Jazz Party" (Mobile Fidelity Labs Gold cd) and Barney Wilen "New York Romance" (Sunnyside or Venus cd) to test playback. These tell me most that I need to know about how a CD player will play back my system, including low volume and rather highly compressed discs.

Edited by jazzbo
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Teasing the Korean said:

Henry Mancini's Combo.

Be sure it is the stereo version.

Looks like an interesting disc - just ordered a copy.

Thanks for the recommendations all, I will post a list of what I used.

Edited by mikeweil
Posted
25 minutes ago, mikeweil said:

Looks like an interesting disc - just ordered a copy.

Thanks for the recommendations all, I will post a list of what I used.

I have an original stereo LP on a RCA black dog label.  It sounds absolutely fantastic, and I always use it to test upgrades to my hi-fi.  The bass and drums are centered, and everything else is nicely spread side to side.  

It is an 11-piece group:  Five brass/winds and 6 rhythm.  Art Pepper is on clarinet.

This album incudes IMO the definitive version of "Moanin'", on which John Williams plays harpsichord.  Other money cuts include "Sidewalks of Cuba," "Swing Lightly," and "Playboy's Theme."

There are two novelty tracks that I find mildly or very annoying, depending on my mood, but I have no issues with the other 10.

 

Posted

Micromega produced always excellent digital stuff, was the other choice back then when I bought a California Audio Lab. As cds I played what I know and love best, so I guess I decided by heart, not by ears, not very audiophile I think.

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, bresna said:

Half price is a good deal.

Just saw I paid even less - list price was € 1.898.00 when it was introduced, most retailers sold it for around 1.600.00, and I paid € 685.00!

3 hours ago, porcy62 said:

Micromega produced always excellent digital stuff

I have their MyAmp and MyZic (headphone amp) in the bedroom, and the MyDac connected to the TV receeiver - all great components.

Edited by mikeweil
  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)

After living with the player for a month I am still testing - my CDs, not the player. It is an extraordinary tool. Every disc sounds different than before, I could write a post on almost every one I played so far. The soundstage is broader, very detailed, so you can hear every note of a chord played by piano or guitar or both on unison, or in a horn section. I had intended this player for my bedroom where I have a MyAmp by Micromega with Foacl speakers and a 30 year old Pioneer CD Player which plays fine and makes good sound but might give in any day due to its age, but the soundstage is too wide for this small room. And since my wife liked the sound so much and insisted it stays in the living room, well, there it remains. 

Bass is softer, not as percussive as with the Marantz SACD player, with a somewhat lower pitched basic sound, drums are more in the background but with  more detail. Old Atlantic stereo recordings fare surprisingly well, sounding very natural. It tickles more detail out of old Blue Notes, setting horns clearly apart, makes pianos soundfiner and warmer even on old shellac transfers. But it is mercilessly displaying enginering weaknesses, espacially with some modern sessions with artificial room ambiance. Sometimes I was almost afraid of playing some of my favourites discs because I knew they would sound different. But saxophones sound fantastic, as if they are standing in the room.

Classical stuff recorded in good acoustics sounds excellent. I regained my love for early music which I didn't listen to for almost a year.

In other words, I have a new colelction of several thousand CDs.

Another surprise: It rewards treating CDs with a special spray (CD-Flux, a rather costly juice) with even more detailed soundstages, whereas the Marantz didn't give a damn. 

So now I can return to posting in the "listening now" threads. 

Edited by mikeweil
Posted
15 hours ago, mikeweil said:

After living with the player for a month I am still testing - my CDs, not the player. It is an extraordinary tool. Every disc sounds different than before, I could write a post on almost every one I played so far. The soundstage is broader, very detailed, so you can hear every note of a chord played by piano or guitar or both on unison, or in a horn section. I had intended this player for my bedroom where I have a MyAmp by Micromega with Foacl speakers and a 30 year old Pioneer CD Player which plays fine and makes good sound but might give in any day due to its age, but the soundstage is too wide for this small room. And since my wife liked the sound so much and insisted it stays in the living room, well, there it remains. 

Bass is softer, not as percussive as with the Marantz SACD player, with a somewhat lower pitched basic sound, drums are more in the background but with  more detail. Old Atlantic stereo recordings fare surprisingly well, sounding very natural. It tickles more detail out of old Blue Notes, setting horns clearly apart, makes pianos soundfiner and warmer even on old shellac transfers. But it is mercilessly displaying enginering weaknesses, espacially with some modern sessions with artificial room ambiance. Sometimes I was almost afraid of playing some of my favourites discs because I knew they would sound different. But saxophones sound fantastic, as if they are standing in the room.

Classical stuff recorded in good acoustics sounds excellent. I regained my love for early music which I didn't listen to for almost a year.

In other words, I have a new colelction of several thousand CDs.

Another surprise: It rewards treating CDs with a special spray (CD-Flux, a rather costly juice) with even more detailed soundstages, whereas the Marantz didn't give a damn. 

So now I can return to posting in the "listening now" threads. 

Interesting, but I thought the kinds of details you are describing would be attributed more to speakers or amps than to CD players.  I didn't realize the model of the CD player could make this much of a difference.  Glad it is working out for you!  :tup

 

Posted

No surprise to me, I've been pursuing quality cd playback for a long time and there are remarkable differences between players, transports and DACs.

Posted
8 hours ago, Teasing the Korean said:

Interesting, but I thought the kinds of details you are describing would be attributed more to speakers or amps than to CD players.  I didn't realize the model of the CD player could make this much of a difference.  Glad it is working out for you!  :tup

 

My experience tells me any component in the chain can make a huge difference in sound.

Posted

For some reason, I've always used this set for my "first disc played" A/B comparisons. Room sound does indeed sound different from player to player.

ODAtODIxOC5qcGVn.jpeg

  • 2 months later...
Posted

I ended up using the new Micromega player in my bedroom as it sounds better with the Micromega MyAmp amplifier than with the Marantz. With the latter I had to turn the volume up so much that the neighbours started complaining. In my (smaller) bedroom I am closer to the speakers (Focal as in the living room) and the higher frequencies are more prominent. And the CD-30 sounds excellent, very detailed, with the MyZic / Focal Spirit Classic combination. I'm satisfied. 

Posted
4 hours ago, mikeweil said:

I ended up using the new Micromega player in my bedroom as it sounds better with the Micromega MyAmp amplifier than with the Marantz. With the latter I had to turn the volume up so much that the neighbours started complaining. In my (smaller) bedroom I am closer to the speakers (Focal as in the living room) and the higher frequencies are more prominent. And the CD-30 sounds excellent, very detailed, with the MyZic / Focal Spirit Classic combination. I'm satisfied. 

There is much to misunderstand here so I think I'll have to watch how I say here... a different amplifier cannot make the music louder. Audio amplifiers don't do anything but amplify. If you were turning up the Marantz louder than the Micromega, that's you, not the amp. What was making you turn it up the Marantz more than the Micromega?

Posted (edited)

The different acoustics of the rooms, I suppose, plus sitting at greater distance from the speakers. But the Marantz makes a mellower, less contoured sound. 

Edited by mikeweil
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On 7/18/2022 at 8:15 AM, mikeweil said:

I ended up using the new Micromega player in my bedroom as it sounds better with the Micromega MyAmp amplifier than with the Marantz. With the latter I had to turn the volume up so much that the neighbours started complaining. In my (smaller) bedroom I am closer to the speakers (Focal as in the living room) and the higher frequencies are more prominent. And the CD-30 sounds excellent, very detailed, with the MyZic / Focal Spirit Classic combination. I'm satisfied. 

I love Focal. I have a pair of Focal Chora 826's which sound fabulous with my Audiolab CDT6000 (which Lon recommended to me) Schiit Bifrost 2 DAC, Sony X700 blu ray player (for SACD and Blu ray audio) and Marantz NR1200 preamp and Marantz MM7025 power amp 

  • 4 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...