king ubu Posted October 23, 2019 Report Posted October 23, 2019 On 10/23/2019 at 11:54 AM, bresna said: Wasn't this whole bootleg series just a way to keep this stuff out of the public domain. Was it the EU that put in a "use it or lose it" clause? Whatever - I was under the impression that the Bob Dylan & Miles bootleg series were created to "use it" so that these recordings are now protected. Expand In part, I guess ... but the Dylan series has gone far beyond the copyright threshold (music from the 70s and 80s). Similar, but not as clearly, with the MD series. Quote
mikeweil Posted October 23, 2019 Report Posted October 23, 2019 On 10/22/2019 at 11:46 PM, Late said: Damn. Sony never got around to collecting a bootleg series of Miles' various tours with Keith Jarrett. Expand Jarrett surely wouldn't be delighted to hear them again. Quote
Big Beat Steve Posted October 23, 2019 Report Posted October 23, 2019 (edited) On 10/23/2019 at 11:54 AM, bresna said: Wasn't this whole bootleg series just a way to keep this stuff out of the public domain. Was it the EU that put in a "use it or lose it" clause? Whatever - I was under the impression that the Bob Dylan & Miles bootleg series were created to "use it" so that these recordings are now protected. Expand Cannot be true. I don't recall such a clause as a key feature of the updated EU copyright law passed in 2012. (This would have made headlines within the music scne for sure) If I understood this correctly, these recordings were not issued before. So they do not even fall under the updated EU copyright law that came into effect in 2012 and will extend the copyright protection for recordings up to 70 instead of 50 years after they were first issued. Besides, others from that series date from way after mid-1962, so even if the recording date would have been decisive (not the first release), these are protected by the current EU law in effect since 2012. Edited October 23, 2019 by Big Beat Steve Quote
Kevin Bresnahan Posted October 23, 2019 Report Posted October 23, 2019 On 10/23/2019 at 12:22 PM, Big Beat Steve said: Cannot be true. I don't recall such a clause as a key feature of the updated EU copyright law passed in 2012. (This would have made headlines within the music scne for sure) If I understood this correctly, these recordings were not issued before. So they do not even fall under the updated EU copyright law that came into effect in 2012 and will extend the copyright protection for recordings up to 70 instead of 50 years after they were first issued. Besides, others from that series date from way after mid-1962, so even if the recording date would have been decisive (not the first release), these are protected by the current EU law in effect since 2012. Expand https://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/07/16/ec_copyright_term_extension/ As far as I can tell, Sony is issuing these Bob Dylan & Miles Davis recordings so that *they* retain the protections and to prevent Dylan & Davis' estate from profiting off of these works. Quote
Big Beat Steve Posted October 23, 2019 Report Posted October 23, 2019 (edited) Info about that clause duly noticed .... but keeping the artists/estates out and preventing the music from falling into the P.D. isn't exactly the same thing, is it? Because if the artists/estates had regained control the music would not have returned to the P.D. either. BTW, this source is from 2008, four years before the law actually went into effect. Did all this go through as planned? I am surprised this use it or lose it clause did not make huge headlines in 2012 (as it would have been bound to, because this clause took care of one of the major complaints by collectors - in any area of popular music). Edited October 23, 2019 by Big Beat Steve Quote
felser Posted October 23, 2019 Report Posted October 23, 2019 On 10/23/2019 at 10:16 AM, Harbour said: That’s a real blow, they were quality releases, there must be tons of great material that is still worth reissuing. i would like to see the sales numbers for them, the last one with Coltrane must have done pretty well surely, it got a ton of great press at the very least. What with Dylan, the grateful Dead etc churning out endless reissues, is Miles really that far behind? Expand Coltrane's "The Lost Album" sold over 250,000 copies. There's still a market. Quote
Late Posted October 23, 2019 Report Posted October 23, 2019 On 10/23/2019 at 12:13 PM, mikeweil said: Jarrett surely wouldn't be delighted to hear them again. Expand But it's the only Jarrett I listen to! Quote
felser Posted October 23, 2019 Report Posted October 23, 2019 On 10/23/2019 at 4:43 PM, bresna said: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/07/16/ec_copyright_term_extension/ As far as I can tell, Sony is issuing these Bob Dylan & Miles Davis recordings so that *they* retain the protections and to prevent Dylan & Davis' estate from profiting off of these works. Expand Beach Boys and Motown have also had releases which were explicitly made for copyright protection. And that was the case for the 36-CD Dylan live 1966 set, which contained some of the most horrible sounding recordings ever (as well as some marvelous ones). Quote
BFrank Posted October 23, 2019 Report Posted October 23, 2019 On 10/23/2019 at 11:38 AM, jazzbo said: I haven't yet become bored and desperate enough to even sample "Rubberband." There's a slim chance this news is premature and may change. We can hope. Expand I'd like to see more 'official' info on this, of course. Quote
mjzee Posted October 23, 2019 Report Posted October 23, 2019 If you read this carefully, it's obvious why Columbia would discontinue the Miles sets: There are no immediate plans to end the Bootleg Series, but the steep decline in the market for physical product does put its future in some jeopardy. “We have to also see how long people keep buying these things,” says the source. “We’ll see what happens. Right now, there’s a certain amount of physical that still gets sold, so we’d like to keep doing them.” https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/bob-dylan-bootleg-series-johnny-cash-nashville-skyline-john-wesley-harding-886719/ Quote
JSngry Posted October 23, 2019 Report Posted October 23, 2019 Some bootlegs were just born to be bootlegs. Quote
mikeweil Posted October 23, 2019 Report Posted October 23, 2019 On 10/23/2019 at 5:40 PM, Late said: But it's the only Jarrett I listen to! Expand Me, too Quote
J.A.W. Posted October 24, 2019 Report Posted October 24, 2019 On 10/23/2019 at 5:40 PM, Late said: But it's the only Jarrett I listen to! Expand Same here Quote
felser Posted October 24, 2019 Report Posted October 24, 2019 On 10/23/2019 at 5:40 PM, Late said: But it's the only Jarrett I listen to! Expand Try this one (on Columbia) Quote
BFrank Posted October 24, 2019 Report Posted October 24, 2019 On 10/24/2019 at 2:48 AM, felser said: Try this one (on Columbia) Expand That was a good album. I haven't heard it in a LONG time, though. Came out a little after this one, which is also good. Quote
JSngry Posted October 24, 2019 Report Posted October 24, 2019 That Burton & Jarrett record is a classic of sorts. It's a pop record, almost, and that's not a dis. Quote
jazzbo Posted October 24, 2019 Report Posted October 24, 2019 Yes, I love it, but there are dozens of Jarrett sessions I love. Quote
felser Posted October 24, 2019 Report Posted October 24, 2019 On 10/24/2019 at 11:53 AM, jazzbo said: Yes, I love it, but there are dozens of Jarrett sessions I love. Expand Me too, in several different styles. The American Quartet, the European Quartet, the solo stuff, the long-running trio all have their merits, and are all very different from each other. Quote
BFrank Posted October 24, 2019 Report Posted October 24, 2019 On 10/24/2019 at 11:50 AM, JSngry said: That Burton & Jarrett record is a classic of sorts. It's a pop record, almost, and that's not a dis. Expand Agreed! Quote
Guy Berger Posted October 25, 2019 Report Posted October 25, 2019 On 10/23/2019 at 12:13 PM, mikeweil said: Jarrett surely wouldn't be delighted to hear them again. Expand Jarrett seemed fairly upbeat about this music around the time of the Cellar Box release. (In the liner notes? I don't remember.) He would obviously take potshots at it because he can't help himself, but maybe leavened with positive comments. On 10/24/2019 at 11:50 AM, JSngry said: That Burton & Jarrett record is a classic of sorts. It's a pop record, almost, and that's not a dis. Expand IMHO, one of the best KJ albums on which Dewey Redman is not present Quote
jazzbo Posted November 2, 2019 Report Posted November 2, 2019 Pete Losin updated his website with a retraction: Miles Davis Bootleg Series (October 2019) Contrary to what I posted here several weeks ago, the Sony/Columbia Legacy Miles Davis Bootleg Series is still alive, although the production schedule has been slowed down. Beginning in 2011 and continuing until 2018, Sony USA released six volumes of live and studio recordings. A seventh volume is in the works. Its release date has not been determined. http://www.plosin.com/MilesAhead/mdNews.aspx Quote
erwbol Posted November 2, 2019 Report Posted November 2, 2019 Great news. Just skip that 80s shit, please. Not remotely interested. Quote
jazzbo Posted November 2, 2019 Report Posted November 2, 2019 That's probably next, so long wait for something else. But there's hope there will be more. Quote
jlhoots Posted November 2, 2019 Report Posted November 2, 2019 On 11/2/2019 at 12:55 AM, jazzbo said: That's probably next, so long wait for something else. But there's hope there will be more. Expand Is there a US source currently for the Rotterdam 1969 CD? Don't want to order from Barcelona. Quote
jazzbo Posted November 2, 2019 Report Posted November 2, 2019 amazon has it for about 20. . . .More expensive than Jazz Messengers. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.