Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

As a kid in Indiana in the late 1970s, I got hipped to a lot of good music by Creem Magazine. My girlfriend and I watched this excellent documentary last night—highly recommended for anybody interested in the music and music journalism of that era:

 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Saw the re-release of Inception in the theatre two weeks ago.  Only 4 of us in there, and the tickets were only $5!  I will have to find a mask that doesn't fog up my glasses though...

Probably will see Tenet this upcoming weekend.  Expecting somewhat larger crowds, but probably still not up to the 35% capacity limit.

Posted
57 minutes ago, ejp626 said:

Saw the re-release of Inception in the theatre two weeks ago.  Only 4 of us in there, and the tickets were only $5!  I will have to find a mask that doesn't fog up my glasses though...

Probably will see Tenet this upcoming weekend.  Expecting somewhat larger crowds, but probably still not up to the 35% capacity limit.

Theatres are closed for the foreseeable future in NJ so I’m wondering how seating worked. I assume that at least every other seat is closed off but what about seats in the row in front of and behind you. I also assume they are numbered seats. 

Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, Brad said:

Theatres are closed for the foreseeable future in NJ so I’m wondering how seating worked. I assume that at least every other seat is closed off but what about seats in the row in front of and behind you. I also assume they are numbered seats. 

I don't know if it is the same everywhere, but here, they sell reserved seats (in pairs, though you can order just one ticket) and then the entire row in front and behind are blocked off.  Then there are three or four seats left vacant until the next available pair, on both sides.  I didn't calculate, but at this theatre, max. capacity is probably closer to 15%, not 35%, with all the blocked off seats.  This could be an issue this weekend, but if it is too crowded, we obviously won't go (or even be let in).

It is fair to say, I am only considering going (to the movies and also to the gym) because community spread is pretty low in Toronto, though edging up very slightly.  In states where there are still thousands of new cases a day, it would be very foolish to go.

Edited by ejp626
Posted
2 hours ago, ejp626 said:

I don't know if it is the same everywhere, but here, they sell reserved seats (in pairs, though you can order just one ticket) and then the entire row in front and behind are blocked off.  Then there are three or four seats left vacant until the next available pair, on both sides.  I didn't calculate, but at this theatre, max. capacity is probably closer to 15%, not 35%, with all the blocked off seats.  This could be an issue this weekend, but if it is too crowded, we obviously won't go (or even be let in).

It is fair to say, I am only considering going (to the movies and also to the gym) because community spread is pretty low in Toronto, though edging up very slightly.  In states where there are still thousands of new cases a day, it would be very foolish to go.

Our governor has been very cautious so no gyms or movie theatres. 

Posted

Just saw Tenet in the theatre.  6 of us, including my son.  It felt pretty safe, and we were well spread out.  Still thinking it through, but there seem to be a handful of huge plot holes.  I guess that's always the case with movies that involve time travel or time inversion in this case.  Still, the effects were pretty cool and probably worth catching on the big screen if you can...

Posted

I generally don't go see films at TIFF during the festival itself, though I sometimes go to see films at TIFF Lightbox after the festival is over.  A couple caught my eye this time around, with Night of the Kings/La Nuit des Rois by Philippe Lacôte probably being the most interesting.  However, it is impossible to get in-person tickets, and the streaming costs $19, which seems on the high side.

I'll wait around and see if it gets picked by another streaming service at some point.

The next film I am likely to see in person is the new Wes Anderson, The French Dispatch, which opens in about a month.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
2 hours ago, catesta said:

I watched this once before several weeks ago and then again this weekend. It's a good one.

The Gentlemen (2019 film) - Wikipedia

Agreed! Saw it in the theatre and just watched it again last night. I do love Guy Ritchie's British gangster movies!

Hugh Grant is especially good in this one!

 

 

 

gregmo

Posted

Rewatched one of my all-time favorite films --

9343845_1.jpg?v=8CC9B2F3E7328E0

It's so brilliant on so many levels -- the acting, the writing, the choreography, the cinematography, the editing (Oscar winner Alan Heim), the musical score (Oscar winner Ralph Burns), the costuming (Oscar winner Albert Wolsky) and set designing.  And if none of that impresses you, there is always Ann Reinking :wub:!!!  For a film so centered around death, it's simply brimming with life.  I remember when I first saw it when it came out in 1979, I was so  gobsmacked by the whole experience, I stayed in my seat to watch the next showing.  Rarely have I done that with a film. 

Posted

Looking through Netflix the other night and saw a "new to me" Bruce Willis action flick, "Trauma Center" (2019). Holy cow is this movie bad and Bruce Willis appears stoned or drunk during his (brief) appearances. Even if he was straight-up sober, his performance was cringe-worthy.

undefined

Posted
2 hours ago, gmonahan said:

Agreed! Saw it in the theatre and just watched it again last night. I do love Guy Ritchie's British gangster movies!

Hugh Grant is especially good in this one!

 

 

 

gregmo

Yeah, I have to admit, I'm not sure the cast could have been any better. McConaughey, Hunnam, Farrell, Golding and Grant, all excellent.

Posted

Borat - the Sequel.

I don't care for the Borat movies (too much like shooting fish in a barrel), but my question is how does he get the people he puts in these films to sign releases?  I know that in a lot of cases people will sign the release and never see the final edit, but for instance, there is this scene with Rudy Giuliani in the sequel.  Given what we know about this scene, how could he ever have gotten a signed release?  Or is he relying on some sort of "public figure" exemption?  I wouldn't think that would apply in this case.  Just daring Rudy to sue him?  I don't get it.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...