jlhoots Posted January 11, 2020 Report Share Posted January 11, 2020 Just Mercy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duaneiac Posted January 14, 2020 Report Share Posted January 14, 2020 And then for something completely different . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duaneiac Posted January 24, 2020 Report Share Posted January 24, 2020 (edited) The Mystery Science Theater 3000 Cheesy Movie Circus Tour came to town last night, so I got to see Joel and the new bots riff on this awful film: This was a suitable flick for the MST3K treatment because it is a really bad movie. A plastic surgeon on the lam (perhaps a former Nazi?) comes into control of a third rate traveling circus. Over the years, he meets a series of deformed young women and uses his surgical abilities to make them beautiful. Then he makes them perform in his circus. His circus becomes famous and successful and when any of beautiful his young patients/performers threaten to leave, he has them killed in an unfortunate performance "accident". This was billed as Joel Hodgson's last MST3K tour, so I'm glad I was able to attend. The jokes around the movie were really good; the stage bits they did in between the film riffing was kind of weak. (Really disappointing to see The Avengers -- not those ones, the real ones -- producer and man who brought us Emma Peel, Julian Wintle, associated with this film.)  Edited January 24, 2020 by duaneiac Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted January 25, 2020 Report Share Posted January 25, 2020 1917. While it was well made, the story wasn’t very good. Pales in comparison to classics like Paths of Glory, All Quiet on the Western Front, Westfront 1918 and so forth.  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlhoots Posted January 29, 2020 Report Share Posted January 29, 2020 Les Miserables - not the musical, the new French film. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted January 29, 2020 Report Share Posted January 29, 2020 1 hour ago, jlhoots said: Les Miserables - not the musical, the new French film. I have no desire to see a movie like that, just as I found a modern version of Great Expectations repellent. I enjoy watching movies based on books as the author intended, not something to suit modern sensibilities. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted January 30, 2020 Report Share Posted January 30, 2020 1 hour ago, Captain Howdy said: According to the review I heard, it's not intended to be a modern version of Les Miserables. The filmmakers chose the title to highlight the similiarities between then and now. I just read the review in the Times. It appears the only thing the two have in common is the name of the movie, Montfermeil, where some of the book took place and the emphasis on the neglected parts of society, which I assume is why the title was chosen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlhoots Posted January 30, 2020 Report Share Posted January 30, 2020 Clemency - Alfre Woodard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duaneiac Posted February 1, 2020 Report Share Posted February 1, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted February 2, 2020 Report Share Posted February 2, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidewinder Posted February 5, 2020 Report Share Posted February 5, 2020 (edited) On 25/01/2020 at 3:59 AM, Brad said: 1917. While it was well made, the story wasn’t very good. Pales in comparison to classics like Paths of Glory, All Quiet on the Western Front, Westfront 1918 and so forth.  I saw it last night and thought it was stunning. The cinematography was out of this world and some of the scenes I thought took your breath away. It was far from the typical war movie but reminded me a bit of Apocalypse Now in the dreamlike feel of some of the scenes and the way that the set pieces transitioned. That burning French town sequence through to the waterfalls was unreal ! People have accused this film of being unemotional but I thought it packed, in its way, a considerable punch. Like the lack of forced sentimentality too. I thought that there was a sort of very familiar look to the scenery around that ruined farmhouse then read that it was actually filmed on the chalk downs North of Salisbury, Wilts !  Ironic, as the WW1 army used to practice around there before being sent into action across the channel. Much of the scenery seems to have made use of the UK - even the white water rapids. Obviously influenced by Tolkien’s books too, in the use of repeating motifs/allegories, ‘way station’ helpers such as the various army officers en route and the ‘mission’ focussing on command instructions in place of the ring. So - a mix of the real and the mythic. Definitely one to see on a large cinema screen with a good sound system. Edited February 5, 2020 by sidewinder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlhoots Posted February 7, 2020 Report Share Posted February 7, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlhoots Posted February 7, 2020 Report Share Posted February 7, 2020 Sorry I didn't make that last post larger - the film is Invisible Life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted February 8, 2020 Report Share Posted February 8, 2020 (edited) Mildly amusing but not worth the price of the ticket. The Bastard’s Fig Tree. Takes place during during the Spanish Civil War. Recommended. It’s on Starz on Demand. Edited February 8, 2020 by Brad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSngry Posted February 15, 2020 Author Report Share Posted February 15, 2020 Fun! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted February 15, 2020 Report Share Posted February 15, 2020 Movie was ok, not as good as The Pianist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted February 15, 2020 Report Share Posted February 15, 2020 This is excellent, a semi fictional look at the collapse of Lehman Brothers.  Just as good as The Big Short, which was a tremendous movie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave James Posted February 16, 2020 Report Share Posted February 16, 2020 On 1/25/2020 at 7:59 PM, Brad said: 1917. While it was well made, the story wasn’t very good. Pales in comparison to classics like Paths of Glory, All Quiet on the Western Front, Westfront 1918 and so forth.  I don't think you're giving it enough credit.  Not only from the standpoint of its "one long shot" premise, but from the context of reality.  The films you mention, especially, "Paths Of Glory", are all well done, but they don't begin to deal with the ugliness of war.  It's like comparing "Sands of Iwo Jima" with the Russian film "Come and See "  At its core, "1917" is an openly anti-war film.  Because it gives you no breaks over its two unrelenting hours, it forces you to confront the palpable brutality of total war. It's an unpleasant film, but one that is trying to make a point and it does so with room to spare. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted February 16, 2020 Report Share Posted February 16, 2020 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Dave James said: I don't think you're giving it enough credit.  Not only from the standpoint of its "one long shot" premise, but from the context of reality.  The films you mention, especially, "Paths Of Glory", are all well done, but they don't begin to deal with the ugliness of war.  It's like comparing "Sands of Iwo Jima" with the Russian film "Come and See "  At its core, "1917" is an openly anti-war film.  Because it gives you no breaks over its two unrelenting hours, it forces you to confront the palpable brutality of total war. It's an unpleasant film, but one that is trying to make a point and it does so with room to spare. Paths of Glory doesn’t begin to deal with the ugliness of war. Guess we are watching different movies. Sorry, but the script in 1917 is weak. It’s just not that great a movie. The so called one long shot was gimmicky. Frankly, I was bored. Edited February 16, 2020 by Brad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlhoots Posted February 16, 2020 Report Share Posted February 16, 2020 The Assistant Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Kart Posted February 16, 2020 Report Share Posted February 16, 2020 6 hours ago, Brad said: This is excellent, a semi fictional look at the collapse of Lehman Brothers.  Just as good as The Big Short, which was a tremendous movie. 2 hours ago, Brad said: Paths of Glory doesn’t begin to deal with the ugliness of war. Guess we are watching different movies. Sorry, but the script in 1917 is weak. It’s just not that great a movie. The so called one long shot was gimmicky. Frankly, I was bored. Anthony Mann's "Men in War" Sam Fuller's "Steel Helmet" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted February 16, 2020 Report Share Posted February 16, 2020 9 hours ago, Larry Kart said: Anthony Mann's "Men in War" Sam Fuller's "Steel Helmet" Thanks for the recs. Perhaps I need to re-see 1917, give it another chance. I mentioned Westfront 1918. This is a great movie, showing the War from the German point of view.  Speaking of which, Schlump by Hans Herbert Grimm, reissued in 2016 by New York Review of Books Classics, is a terrific book about the War from the German side. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Kart Posted February 16, 2020 Report Share Posted February 16, 2020 Oddly enough, both of those films were set in the then present-day conflict, the Korean War, which gives them much immediacy. A good deal more lurid is Robert Aldrich's "Attack!" (1957), set in World War II. Great performance by Eddie Albert as a cowardly commanding officer. It's the movie to see if you want to watch a German tank run over Jack Palance's arm.  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSngry Posted February 16, 2020 Author Report Share Posted February 16, 2020 1 hour ago, Larry Kart said:  It's the movie to see if you want to watch a German tank run over Jack Palance's arm. Are there no other options? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Kart Posted February 16, 2020 Report Share Posted February 16, 2020 6 hours ago, JSngry said: Are there no other options? Options for what? I mentioned that scene because it is iconically powerful in itself and leads to the film's shocking conclusion. If you do see "Attack!" you'll know why the Defense Department refused to cooperate in the making of the film. (Below) Palance versus (actually) two German tanks:  And there's a good deal more after this. BTW, "Men in War" is the ultimate Aldo Ray movie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_forumlogo.png.a607ef20a6e0c299ab2aa6443aa1f32e.png)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.