Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Suspicion - Alfred Hitchcock (1941)

Image result for suspicion 1941 olive

Despite the deeply daft studio dictated ending, the film is a very enjoyable yarn with a jaundiced look at the British upper crust still more than valid today, as events are showing.

Edited by kinuta
  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted
59 minutes ago, Matthew said:

What's the 411? as the kids say...

My visceral, intellectually-undeveloped opinion is that I loved it.  Went with several friends last night and we're all planning to go see it again as soon as possible.  

12 minutes ago, Brad said:

Received a very good review in the Times. 

It's trending around 90% right now on Rotten Tomatoes' critical-consensus meter (audience reviews around the same mark).

Posted
6 hours ago, Brad said:

I saw it on a large screen when it was first released. In the unlikely event that it's shown here in IMAX, I'll go and see it.

The blurb doesn't actually tell us what The Final Cut is. I wonder if it's the original cut , the extended version, or some hybrid, newly edited version.

 

 

Laura - Otto Preminger (1944)

Image result for laura blu ray

Posted
8 hours ago, kinuta said:

I saw it on a large screen when it was first released. In the unlikely event that it's shown here in IMAX, I'll go and see it.

The blurb doesn't actually tell us what The Final Cut is. I wonder if it's the original cut , the extended version, or some hybrid, newly edited version.

I think  (don't really know) "final cut" might mean yet another version which Coppola thinks is definitive. I saw it in Cannes when it was first shown there and I don't think that version was ever screened again.  IIRC it had a slightly different ending than later versions.    The sound at the screening was amazing. 

Posted
1 hour ago, medjuck said:

I think  (don't really know) "final cut" might mean yet another version which Coppola thinks is definitive. I saw it in Cannes when it was first shown there and I don't think that version was ever screened again.  IIRC it had a slightly different ending than later versions.    The sound at the screening was amazing. 

How did the ending differ?

By the way the movie (although not by name) is discussed in the book The Sympathizer by Viet Thanh Nguyen, who writes about the War from a Vietnamese perspective. He’s not complimentary about the movie or Coppola. Great book. 

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Brad said:

How did the ending differ?

By the way the movie (although not by name) is discussed in the book The Sympathizer by Viet Thanh Nguyen, who writes about the War from a Vietnamese perspective. He’s not complimentary about the movie or Coppola. Great book. 

IIRC (and I often don't) Martin Sheen comes out of the cave after killing Kurtz and the tribesmen are now all bowing down to him. 

Edited by medjuck
Posted
6 hours ago, Brad said:

How did the ending differ?

By the way the movie (although not by name) is discussed in the book The Sympathizer by Viet Thanh Nguyen, who writes about the War from a Vietnamese perspective. He’s not complimentary about the movie or Coppola. Great book. 

I've had a kindle of that book for several months but haven't got round to it yet.

Will read soon. Thanks.

Posted
2 minutes ago, kinuta said:

I've had a kindle of that book for several months but haven't got round to it yet.

Will read soon. Thanks.

FWIW, I agree that it's an excellent book.

Posted
On 7/26/2019 at 11:21 AM, ghost of miles said:

My visceral, intellectually-undeveloped opinion is that I loved it.  Went with several friends last night and we're all planning to go see it again as soon as possible.  

It's trending around 90% right now on Rotten Tomatoes' critical-consensus meter (audience reviews around the same mark).

I saw it light last night and also loved it.  It's different than other Tarantino movies for the most part. I'd label it his ode or paean to Hollywood in the 60s, to the way things used to be. He recreates the 60s in a way that takes you back, if you were alive at that time. He also tries to rewrite history a little bit or creates a history that he wishes had happened. More I should probably not say. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...