Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, jazzbo said:

I get that. But there's been a planned use of jazz inclusion in other albums Kasami and others have appeared on that certainly may not be the same "planned agenda" but may be a bit similar. . . . 

Despite Allen's lack of jealousy (which I believe I guess) I do think there's some jealousy in some reactions (not saying here) to this release. I think I'll pull it out of the shelves and put it into the listening pile again, I like it.

I suspect a lot of it is typical fandom behavior - a discomfort with an influx of newcomer fans who haven't "paid their dues" by genuflecting to the "fandom canon".

  • Replies 156
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

It is intriguing to me. When I play "The Epic", I hear a pleasant enough, but somewhat slight, album. It's almost an easy listening album in spots. I like the piano solos, and the trumpet and trombone solos, although I recognize that they are not up there with the greatest works of all time. Some of the melodies are pleasing, if not legendary.

So I do not understand why masses of young people attend his concerts, and why the album ends up on Top 10 Lists in national publications. Not Top 10 jazz lists. It is on Top 10 music lists period. I do not understand why people have written so enthusiastically about it. I have read more than one account of people being very enthused upon initially hearing the album. Really? Where is all of this positive enthusiasm coming from?

Allen, I also do not understand why you muster up the energy to be repeatedly very negative about it. "The Epic" does not seem to be strong enough to warrant such attention. To me, it is like writing repeatedly in several different places online about how mayonnaise really irks the heck out of you. Really? Who can get so worked up about it? It's too neutral to become one's constant target, from what I can perceive.

What am I missing about "The Epic", and Kamasi Washington, that make people feel such strong emotion, both positive and negative?

 

 

Posted (edited)

well, someone has to....think of it in political terms; if the mayor of South Portland Maine was saying racist and homophobic things you would think it reprehensible and would disagree with that mayor but you would not spend a lot of energy on it because it's effin' South Portland Maine and who's gonna know? But Donald Trump says those things, and you realize that he is a national figure getting national attention - so it demands intelligent, reasoned response. That's how I honestly feel about Kamasai versus, say, Artie Clitenmacher, the clarinetist from Saskatchewan who has put on priest's robes and started playing Christian Spiritualist Anthems based on Jesus' dialogs with Coltrane. Artie will remain obscure and needs no one to point out the error of his ways or the silliness of his ideas.

Edited by AllenLowe
Posted

So if I understand what you just wrote Allen, you find Kamasi Washington and "The Epic" to be not just underwhelming compared to the praise and attention they have received. You find Kamasi Washington and "The Epic" to be offensively terrible, on the level of moral outrage that you would feel about an avowed racist?

Posted
7 hours ago, rdavenport said:

Doesn't this kind of thing happen fairly frequently in the arts though? A pop group or a new book creates a buzz among the chattering classes, garners mainstream acceptance and then somehow assumes a cultural significance greater than it's original intent or intrinsic artistic value.      

You need to add "and then the self-consciously hip go out of their way to be unimpressed."

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, paul secor said:

Does it follow that if you're unimpressed, then you're self-conciously hip?

I don't think it follows. However, I have noticed on the online music boards which I read, including some other than this one, that certain members will seem to delight in negatively commenting on virtually any new release. as a seeming kneejerk reaction, a default response. Other members will offer a more detailed, thoughtful explanation of why they find some new releases lacking in merit, and why other new releases are more meritorious in their view.

Edited by Hot Ptah
Posted

We all have things that we don't take to. I'm referring to the serially unimpressed, people who seem to define themselves by how hard they are to please. I think they like to think of it as 'discrimination' or 'fine taste'. 

Always reminds me of:

Frasier-WithNiles.jpg 

 

Posted (edited)

Am I the only old white man who thinks it's not my job to tell young Black people what they should be playing or listening to? 

Edited by medjuck
left out question mark.
Posted
19 hours ago, AllenLowe said:

well, someone has to....think of it in political terms; if the mayor of South Portland Maine was saying racist and homophobic things you would think it reprehensible and would disagree with that mayor but you would not spend a lot of energy on it because it's effin' South Portland Maine and who's gonna know? But Donald Trump says those things, and you realize that he is a national figure getting national attention - so it demands intelligent, reasoned response. That's how I honestly feel about Kamasai versus, say, Artie Clitenmacher, the clarinetist from Saskatchewan who has put on priest's robes and started playing Christian Spiritualist Anthems based on Jesus' dialogs with Coltrane. Artie will remain obscure and needs no one to point out the error of his ways or the silliness of his ideas.

Is this real, this SK clarinetist, or did you just make him up?  Where in Saskatchewan and is he connected to the shootings?

Posted

1) Dana, sorry, I made up that name.

2) Joe, I don't think anyone is telling anyone what they should or shouldn't be listening to; we (or at least I) are just explaining why we don't like the music. What else should we do?

Posted (edited)

Allen, I am still asking, do you find Kamasi Washington and "The Epic" more than just unworthy of the degree of attention that it is getting? Do you consider it to be a menace, which needs to be fought, and condemned in print as often as possible, as one would condemn an avowed racist? You used the Trump comparison in your earlier post here.

 

It would be possible if one did not like the music, to make no comment about it, or to say "I'll pass" once. But I have observed that you have written quite often here, and on Facebook, regarding your rather deep antipathy for Kamasi Washington and "The Epic." What makes him, and this album, so much worse than any number of other albums and artists who have come along in the past several years?

 

Edited by Hot Ptah
Posted
3 hours ago, AllenLowe said:

1) Dana, sorry, I made up that name.

2) Joe, I don't think anyone is telling anyone what they should or shouldn't be listening to; we (or at least I) are just explaining why we don't like the music. What else should we do?

Well opera often gets great reviews and many of my friends love  opera but I don't like it .  But I also don't feel a need to tell them they're wrong.  

Posted
20 minutes ago, medjuck said:

Well opera often gets great reviews and many of my friends love  opera but I don't like it .  But I also don't feel a need to tell them they're wrong.  

Yeah, but what would they say if you went an and on about some opera they thought wasn't all that?

Posted (edited)

Hot Ptah, I find The Epic less offensive than I find some of the reaction to it, and so I feel the need to respond. More than one critic who should know better has held it up as a great and prophetic work. This requires, IMHO, a corrective response.

And my favorite opera performance is Alfalfa singing Barber of Seville.

Edited by AllenLowe
Posted
1 hour ago, danasgoodstuff said:

Yeah, but what would they say if you went an and on about some opera they thought wasn't all that?

They'd say I didn't know anything about opera and I'd say who gives a fuck, I know what I like.

Posted
8 hours ago, medjuck said:

Am I the only old white man who thinks it's not my job to tell young Black people what they should be playing or listening to? 

But...we know what It all means...right?

Posted

Allen, what happened to allowing a younger artist a chance to develop? Maybe Kamasi Washington's next album willl be better. I don't understand your need to crush the guy in print at every opportunity. 

As far as I know, Kamasi did not arrange for the reviews and audience for his album. He has not given arrogant interviews designed to inflame people's passions like a Trump. So why the animosity? 

I read reviews daily that I strongly disagree with. Films, books, music, which I don't think much of, get positive reviews. It has never occurred to me that I must mount a one man campaign to "set the record straight" at every opportunity. No one is going to read or remember what we send out in pixels, in the infinite online data stream.

 

Posted (edited)

I don't want to 'crush' him; I just want to counter what I believe is so much hype; I think it has to be done when there is so much on the other side; as I implied earlier, I see it as being just as important as politics. The failure to respond creates a false image of consensus. I feel like I need to go on record when I feel the majority opinion is unjust and unfair.

and truthfully, to Kamasai, as with Wynton, I am merely a flee on the butt of the great promotional machine.

Edited by AllenLowe
Posted (edited)

Allen, I don't see any huge promotional machine behind Kamasi Washington. I have never seen his CD in any Barnes and Noble, Wal Mart, Target, or any other brick and mortar store. He is on the list of Top Albums of the Year on some online blogs and webpages, but that it about it. All of my jazz loving friends around the United States who are not on the Organissimo board, had never heard of him until I mentioned him recently. What huge promotion are you talking about?

I am quite sure that if he was booked to play in Kansas City, that he would draw less than 50 people. He is not a widely known artist, at all. He has never been mentioned once in our Kansas City daily newspaper.

Also, Allen, what "consensus" are you pushing back against? As far as I can tell, fewer than twenty people have written about him online, or named his album to their Top Albums of 2015 Lists. Who notices those lists anyway? I know that I never read them. Mostly he is completely unknown, except maybe in his hometown, and among a tiny circle of online bloggers.

I think that you are firing a cruise missile at a flea.

Edited by Hot Ptah
Posted

In an earlier post, I wrote that (this article) probably can't hurt. Thinking about it, I'd have to reconsider that statement. It can hurt, in that it's part of the general dumbing down of what the media feeds the public.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...