Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
18 minutes ago, mikeweil said:

The playing would get 8 out of ten points from me. I think the singers overdo it a little bit. Only if you are deeply into 17th century Roman baroque. Stradella e.g. is the more compelling composer.

Thnx .... as this is a budget release will give it a try .... 

  • Replies 23.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • soulpope

    8199

  • Peter Friedman

    5145

  • Referentzhunter

    2856

  • HutchFan

    1252

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

Schumann, Piano Quintet / Piano Quartet / Piano Trios Nos. 1-3

Beaux Arts Trio, Samuel Rhodes (viola, Quintet and Quartet), Dolf Bettelheim (violin, Quintet) (Philips)

NjYtNTQxOS5qcGVn.jpeg

Posted (edited)

Now listening to this opera:

NjgtNTk2Mi5qcGVn.jpeg

Prokofiev: War and Peace / Melik-Pashayev, Kibkalo, Vishnevskaya, Petrov, et al (Melodiya, rec. 1959)

Years ago, after buying it used, I discovered that the first CD in this set is defective.  :(  So today I began with Scene 8 -- the first of the "war scenes" that make up the second half of the opera -- on disc 2.

 

 

48 minutes ago, Chuck Nessa said:

A favorite since the '70s.

:tup  Yes, both Münch and Roussel are terrific.

 

Edited by HutchFan
Posted

I'm listening to a couple different interpretations of Brahms' Ballades, Op. 10:

Mi03ODY0LmpwZWc.jpeg

 

and 

MDItMTYxNi5qcGVn.jpeg

It's probably unfair to compare Peter Rösel with Emil Gilels.  (It's probably unfair to compare any pianist with Gilels. ;))  But Rösel holds his own.  He doesn't quite plumb the depths that Gilels does.  Rösel's reading is much more "middle of the road"; even so, it's still very impressive.  Gilels, on the other hand, is much more mercurial.  His recording modulates outward and inward by turns, sometimes imperious & extroverted and other times intensely lyrical & inner-focused. 

Maybe I'll listen to Michelangeli and Rubinstein next. 

 

Posted
12 minutes ago, HutchFan said:

I'm listening to a couple different interpretations of Brahms' Ballades, Op. 10:

Mi03ODY0LmpwZWc.jpeg

 

and 

MDItMTYxNi5qcGVn.jpeg

It's probably unfair to compare Peter Rösel with Emil Gilels.  (It's probably unfair to compare any pianist with Gilels. ;))  But Rösel holds his own.  He doesn't quite plumb the depths that Gilels does.  Rösel's reading is much more "middle of the road"; even so, it's still very impressive.  Gilels, on the other hand, is much more mercurial.  His recording modulates outward and inward by turns, sometimes imperious & extroverted and other times intensely lyrical & inner-focused. 

Maybe I'll listen to Michelangeli and Rubinstein next. 

Rösel has consistently a level-headed approach, which works fine with Brahms ....  Gilels a magician off course ....

Posted (edited)

Continuing with my little exploration of Brahms' Op. 10:

NS02NTczLnBuZw.jpeg

 

and

71p0RGfgwsL._UF600,600_QL80_.jpg

 

 

38 minutes ago, soulpope said:

Rösel has consistently a level-headed approach, which works fine with Brahms ....

Yes. "Level-headed" is a good description.  It's very effective indeed.

 

Edited by HutchFan

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...