Jump to content

Marsalis plays Monk


Milestones

Recommended Posts

OK, my formative years in jazz coincided with the rise of Marsalis, so I bought into the Downbeat covers, the TV appearances, and everything. I did learn soon enough he was not the Second Coming. But some things caught my eye even later on, such as the Monk record (1999). Every halfway decent jazz musician can do something with Monk—and despite what the detractors say, Wynton is much better than halfway decent. He had some good musicians at the time, such as my man Wycliffe Gordon and Eric Reed. I like the ensemble size (septet), and many tracks emphasize the higher sounds—soprano sax and trumpet in upper register (through not shrill). I don’t know what Marsalis thought of Steve Lacy (or Lacy of Marsalis), but having the two together in an ensemble of this size would have been intriguing.

I did listen to this record not long after it came out and found some tracks to be very good while others were quite underwhelming. Now in checking it out again I find that most of it works. I especially like the tracks with smaller groups—a trio of soprano, piano and bass; a piano trio. Wynton certainly does not hog the limelight. But when he gets a spotlight feature on “Ugly Beauty” (a duet with Reed), he really shines; in fact, I think this is one of his finest ballad performances ever.

It’s basically a relaxed and fun record. But that's just the point. Wynton never was (or will be) the great composer/arranger he aspires to be. But let him explore Monk...and the music is pretty fine.

Edited by Milestones
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The general feeling seems to be that his first three albums (along with his appearance on Hancock's Quartet) are his best. I would agree with that assessment.

Still, he has real talent, and I don't understand those who dismiss most or all of his career.

I used to own Citi Movement and the cheap Live at the Vanguard box. Of the albums you mentioned I only have the Hancock Quartet from the Columbia box. I've yet to listen to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't really bothered with new Marsalis releases in the 15 years since, except I did like the meeting with Willie Nelson. Also, he has a fine feature on "Picasso"--on a big band record under Ted Nash's name.

Does that cover Live At The House Of Tribes, as well as the phenomenal Village Vanguard box set? If so, I would highly recommend each.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the Monk record, but it's taken me a while. It's unusual to hear Monk's music performed in that way, and i think the slightly pristine/not-sterile-but-not-particularly-warm-either recording adds to the initial cognitive dissonance. I haven't listened to it in a while, but from memory i was disappointed that they did Brilliant Corners only as a piano trio! :)

On his more recent stuff, The Vitoria Suite from 2010 is a kick arse big band record. He actually hasn't released anything that isn't a collaboration with Nelson/Clapton or a compilation since then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember ( I'm very sure correctly) that it was simply the worst attempt at Monk I've ever heard

Try ICP, Lacy, Available Jelly, Ellery Eskelin and numerous others first

Please

Btw - currently listening to Lacy's Quartet rip up Epistrophy

Standing on a Whale Fishing for Minnows

Edited by Steve Reynolds
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard him play "Think of One" live with his brother Branford and Mel lewis at the late, lamented Mt. Hood Festival of Jazz and was quite taken with it. Lots of energy there. And then heard the album in question and wasn't nearly so impressed, still thought it was better than the Jelly Roll Morton thing he did 'bout the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh...

The Jelly Roll album may be his all time worst.

That's really the biggest issue with Marsalis. He has put out some real gems. Even Mr. Reynolds, who holds a rather profound hatred of all things Wynton Marsalis, gave a fairly enthusiastic thumbs up to the Village Vanguard box. But, he has also lined his catalog with some truly epic turds. His catalog is a minefield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh...

The Jelly Roll album may be his all time worst.

That's really the biggest issue with Marsalis. He has put out some real gems. Even Mr. Reynolds, who holds a rather profound hatred of all things Wynton Marsalis, gave a fairly enthusiastic thumbs up to the Village Vanguard box. But, he has also lined his catalog with some truly epic turds. His catalog is a minefield.

I believe the Vanguard box also contained some Monk covers, and they felt wrong to me. On the other hand, I think Anthony Braxton's Monk tribute album on Black Saint is brilliant. Paul Motian's Monk in Motian is also alright. Those are the only Monk tribute albums in my collection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like it or not, Monk is the Mozart or Beethoven of jazz, and everyone ought to take a crack at some of his music (not necessarily full album tributes)--and most have. Hell, half of Steve Lacy' long career was playing Monk.

I'm just not sure how you successfully play Monk as a trumpeter. I always figured that why he almost always used a speed merchant sax player in his groups. Rouse being the exception, but he solo'd exact the same way as Monk, so it worked well.

Monk leaves too much space for most trumpeters to fill, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Monk leaves too much space for most trumpeters to fill, IMO.

Please explain?

Space is space, not sure if there is intrinsic "trumpet space" to be filled vs "tenor space". Perhaps I'm misunderstanding the notion?

Either way, Ray Copeland & Thad Jones both handled the spaces they were given just dandily...I'd add Joe Gordon too, but slightly less dandily.

And from a different instrumental approach, Don Cherry played him some Monk too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still, he has real talent, and I don't understand those who dismiss most or all of his career.

It's kinda like Will Clark taking over the Hall Of Fame and remaking it in his own image.

I don't think even that evocative image does it justice -- more like Will Clark taking over all of baseball from Little League on up to the HOF and trying to remake it in his image.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW, Miles recast/simplified the bridge of "Well You Needn't," just as he did the bridge of Benny Carter's "When Lights Are Low." For the most part, most people now play those pieces using Miles' simplifications. OTOH, in both cases, what Miles chose to do to those pieces was not malicious or thoughtless or some such; what he did just made those pieces more attractive for him to play on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...