Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 467
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

How much stuff do you have out there?

Chuck gave a very precise answer.

Might be time to pull some sheet music ...

No, "my life's work" is not a "precise" answer. That tells me absolutely nothing as far as how many copyrighted titles he's referring to.

That's like asking me "what did you eat", and me responding "everything!"

Posted

How much stuff do you have out there?

Chuck gave a very precise answer.

Might be time to pull some sheet music ...

No, "my life's work" is not a "precise" answer. That tells me absolutely nothing as far as how many copyrighted titles he's referring to.

That's like asking me "what did you eat", and me responding "everything!"

http://www.nessarecords.com/shop/

Posted (edited)

Thank you. One look at those titles would tell me that they probably aren't streamed much. Most Jazz fans I know, myself included, don't even use streaming services.

I'd still like to know how the rates are determined.

Edited by Scott Dolan
  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

One band I am involved with has 5 tunes available on one streaming platform. Total plays at this point are around 10,000 after a few months. Earnings $1.98. And that if I'm not mistaken is considerably more than what Spotify pays.

As to the original question, I suppose if you call the online streaming services themselves the music business, then I think yes, it's saving the hell out of them. As for the musicians, this is the kind of revenue stream you can't even die on much less live on.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

And another exploration:

Is streaming good for music?

I've no idea what the eventual outcome will be. But I could identify immediately with the Metallica chap:

"Thirty, 40 years ago I would get on my bike, drive to the record store, spend time figuring out which record I could buy by listening to a bunch of them. By the time I got home I would end up spending every minute of my free time for the next week just acting with this particular record.

"Nowadays music, to an extent, for some people it's become kind of background noise."

Now, I wouldn't want to go back to 1970 - I like the wealth of music available and make major use of what is on offer. But there is no doubt that I knew those records I bought one at a time on a limited budget far more thoroughly than the music I buy (or stream) all too easily today. 

 

 

Posted (edited)

Then why all the hand-wringing over all of this?

Shit, I listened to the radio for free every day. I also made a ton of cassette tapes of tunes I recorded, for free, off of the radio. 

Are the current trends really that different? 

Edited by Scott Dolan
Posted

:lol::lol::lol:

"I was there. 
AM radio kicked streaming's ass. 
Analog Cassettes and 8 tracks also kicked streaming's ass, 
and absolutely rocked compared to streaming.

Streaming sucks. Streaming is the worst audio in history. 
If you want it, you got it. It's here to stay. 
Your choice.

Copy my songs if you want to. That's free. 
Your choice.

All my music, my life's work, is what I am preserving the way I want it to be.

It's already started. My music is being removed from all streaming services. It's not good enough to sell or rent.

Make streaming sound good and I will be back." - Neil Young

 

Translation: "I'm ready for my straightjacket now!" 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...