Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It'd be nice to see downloads though I admit I would have no interest in them. But it seems thorny, rightswise, and it furthermore seems preferable to make the entire catalogue available from 1976 on, which would be a massive undertaking for such a small operation.

Posted (edited)

The smaller classical labels are streets ahead of jazz on this. It might be argued that Chandos/Hyperion are medium size but just look at this from Gimell, the Tallis Scholars label:

http://www.gimell.com/recording-Thomas-Tallis---Spem-in-alium.aspx

A format for every fetish.

The performers on Hat and Emanem cannot be wealthy people - I'm sure they could hardly object to expanding the formats available. I can see start up costs (and workload) might be considerable but once established... The big bonus comes in 'impulse buying'. If I have to order and wait I might um and ah a bit. If after being thrilled by a Barry Guy or whatever record I feel the desire for another and can access it straight away then a sale is much more likely (whether I should be so easily manipulated by a desire for instant gratification is something else).

The whole audiophile thing seems to have some labels stuck and shooting themselves in the foot. Gimell make both physical and download available - the first are there for those who feel that format is superior and allows for sales at concerts (and in cathedral gift shops!); the latter helps those of us out who don't live near a decent record shop and suffer from impatience.

Edited by A Lark Ascending
Posted

I can see start up costs (and workload) might be considerable but once established...

If the title has ever had a CD release, then the masters are already in digital format...I wouldn't think there's much additional cost in converting AIFF format to mp3, FLAC, etc.

Posted

I can see start up costs (and workload) might be considerable but once established...

If the title has ever had a CD release, then the masters are already in digital format...I wouldn't think there's much additional cost in converting AIFF format to mp3, FLAC, etc.

But the workload for a one (or few) man operation to change from an established approach might be daunting. I don't know. If you can start and keep a label running, recording much music yourself and then release it with little hope of selling many...well, the adjustment to downloads doesn't seem to be as big a step.

I just know that if Emanen and Hat were downloadable I'd buy more. I pick up a fair few Intakt discs that way (though they don't have everything out that way).

  • 2 years later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...