Larry Kart Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 Uther Pendragon -- you heard it here first. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Beat Steve Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 (edited) Kurt. So he (or rather his parents) can show there are some musical inclinations to soothe the rock tastes of a generation not so far ago and not that old yet. Other musically inclined "king"-ish names such as Crimson or even Perry or Kolax might be a bit too far back in time by now. Edited July 24, 2013 by Big Beat Steve Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonnymax Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 Prince schmince. I can't believe there are people out there who give a shit. I mean, people take time out of their lives to go and hang out at the hospital, or in the Middletons' home village. What the fuck for? What the fuck could it possibly have to do with you? Excuse the profanity, but the UK populace's interest in the Royals has always pushed my buttons. Phew According to Reuters, analysts say the hype around the birth of the future monarch could jumpstart the British economy by 240 million pounds, or up to $400 million. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Beat Steve Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 According to Reuters, analysts say the hype around the birth of the future monarch could jumpstart the British economy by 240 million pounds, or up to $400 million. Sure. An economy can thrive on selling (yet more) mugs with the (soon to be outdated) picture of an infant ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Magnificent Goldberg Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 According to Reuters, analysts say the hype around the birth of the future monarch could jumpstart the British economy by 240 million pounds, or up to $400 million. Sure. An economy can thrive on selling (yet more) mugs with the (soon to be outdated) picture of an infant ... Well, an economy can thrive on practically anything, provided it can thrive on it But 240 million sounds far-fetched to me. Do these analysts know by how much the UK economy was boosted by the birth of William? MG Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Train Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 (edited) According to Reuters, analysts say the hype around the birth of the future monarch could jumpstart the British economy by 240 million pounds, or up to $400 million. Sure. An economy can thrive on selling (yet more) mugs with the (soon to be outdated) picture of an infant ... Well, an economy can thrive on practically anything, provided it can thrive on it But 240 million sounds far-fetched to me. Do these analysts know by how much the UK economy was boosted by the birth of William? MG Not far fetched.... http://www.reuters.com/video/2013/07/23/the-queen-of-royal-souvenirs?videoId=196106172&videoChannel=2602 Edited July 24, 2013 by Blue Train Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Train Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 (edited) She turned her place into a BB and you can see she's not having problems keeping it booked. $124 a night and it's booked for 13 months. https://www.wimdu.co.uk/offers/B3KCHBS3 Edited July 24, 2013 by Blue Train Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jazzbo Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 I vote for Onslo. Well, this has been dominating the news, but there's worse news that could have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillF Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 Well, this has been dominating the news, but there's worse news that could have. Exactly. That's why there's a royalfest here every few months. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidewinder Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 Well, this has been dominating the news, but there's worse news that could have. Exactly. That's why there's a royalfest here every few months. It's either that.... or Operation Yewtree.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hardbopjazz Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 So it is official, his name is George Alexander Louis of Cambridge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidewinder Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 I guess they picked the 'Alexander' bit from the last Tsar and the 'Louis' must have come from Lord Mountbatten. Covering all bases... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonnymax Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 According to Reuters, analysts say the hype around the birth of the future monarch could jumpstart the British economy by 240 million pounds, or up to $400 million. Sure. An economy can thrive on selling (yet more) mugs with the (soon to be outdated) picture of an infant ... Don't underestimate the royal tyke's earning power, or that of his family. According to the Telegraph: The British tourism agency has reported that the royal family generates close to 500 million pounds, or about $767 million, every year in tourism revenue, drawing visitors to historic royal sites like the Tower of London, Windsor Castle, and Buckingham Palace. The country's tourism agency says that of the 30 million foreign visitors who came to Britain in 2010, 5.8 million visited a castle. Tourism is the third-biggest industry in the U.K., the tourism board claims, and supports about 2.6 million jobs -- or about one in 12. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king ubu Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 Someone should build boats and set over tha jacobins ... also how can anyone's future son be born now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Train Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 (edited) I guess they picked the 'Alexander' bit from the last Tsar and the 'Louis' must have come from Lord Mountbatten. Covering all bases... More likely in honor of the Queen since one of her names is Alexandra. It's probably a combination of Lord Mountbatten, or his father Prince Louis of Battenberg who was William's great-great grandfather. Edited July 24, 2013 by Blue Train Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSngry Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 Is it unnatural to have an urge to eat a Royal Baby? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king ubu Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 a royal sh*t? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neal Pomea Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 GAL Windsor! Nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GA Russell Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 I can understand the tourists' desire to see castles and the Tower of London, but I think that it is a stretch to suggest that that interest reflects favorably on the royal family of 2013. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Litweiler Posted July 24, 2013 Report Share Posted July 24, 2013 ok as long as his nickname is Jelly Roll Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uli Posted July 25, 2013 Report Share Posted July 25, 2013 So it is official, his name is George Alexander Louis of Cambridge. Boy George II Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Garrett Posted July 25, 2013 Report Share Posted July 25, 2013 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aggie87 Posted July 25, 2013 Report Share Posted July 25, 2013 I think it's obvious that either William or Catherine is a Seinfeld fan - George Costanza, Jason Alexander, and Julia Louis Dreyfus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alocispepraluger102 Posted July 25, 2013 Report Share Posted July 25, 2013 (edited) .........can't use king james---nike has the copyright. Edited July 25, 2013 by alocispepraluger102 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidewinder Posted July 25, 2013 Report Share Posted July 25, 2013 a royal sh*t? No more of those are required.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_forumlogo.png.a607ef20a6e0c299ab2aa6443aa1f32e.png)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.