Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Since "avant garde" is almost always misused by now, the vague "modern" sometimes serves as a substitute, maybe. Actually "modern" seems to work best w/a modifier attached, for ex. "post-WW2 modern jazz," "Django's later, modern style." Still, I don't say "modern" very often any more.

Posted (edited)

Post Bop/Hard Bop

Texas Swing...well, maybe.

Fusion Jazz

Alternative Rock

Living Art

3-D Chalk Street Art

Edited by GoodSpeak
Posted

Modern? Amongst others and in no particular order:

Walter Benjamin, Franz Kafka, John Dos Passos, Sidney Bechet, Igor Stravinsky, Anton Webern, Arnold Schönberg, Marcel Duchamp, Man Ray, Kurt Schwitters, Jean Arp, Constantin Brancusi, Pablo Picasso, Fernand Léger, André Breton, Arthur Honegger, Darius Milhaud, Le Corbusier, Alberto Giacometti, Karl Kraus, Lyonel Feiningen, Johannes Itten, Walter Gropius, Paul Klee, Wassily Kandinsky, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Peter Szondi, Brassaï, Robert Walser, Joseph Roth, Alfred Döblin.

Not many women in this list, I'm afraid ... there must be some that deserve inclusion though, I'm sure. First to come to mind are Anna Achmatova, Rose Ausländer and Lou Andreas-Salomé

Posted (edited)

When it comes to music most of what I listen to is from the past (though most of it would have been 'Modern' in its time). But I can't bring myself to live totally in the past - I'm always pulled by the thought of the new (though even there I tend to find things more rewarding with aural roots in the past).

Quite different with reading - I did my period of reading (some of) 'the classics' a long time ago. Today I'm much more likely to read a recent piece of fiction than something from the past.

And with history books I'll always reach for a newer account of an event or period over a 'classic' account from the past.

I've never been drawn to an exclusive focus on either the modern or the (perceived) classical canon (bizarrely - or maybe not - Modernism is now part of the latter).

Edited by A Lark Ascending
Posted

Modern? Amongst others and in no particular order:

Walter Benjamin, Franz Kafka, John Dos Passos, Sidney Bechet, Igor Stravinsky, Anton Webern, Arnold Schönberg, Marcel Duchamp, Man Ray, Kurt Schwitters, Jean Arp, Constantin Brancusi, Pablo Picasso, Fernand Léger, André Breton, Arthur Honegger, Darius Milhaud, Le Corbusier, Alberto Giacometti, Karl Kraus, Lyonel Feiningen, Johannes Itten, Walter Gropius, Paul Klee, Wassily Kandinsky, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Peter Szondi, Brassaï, Robert Walser, Joseph Roth, Alfred Döblin.

Not many women in this list, I'm afraid ... there must be some that deserve inclusion though, I'm sure. First to come to mind are Anna Achmatova, Rose Ausländer and Lou Andreas-Salomé

Yes. Certainly 'the big three' of 'Modernism' were Picasso, Stravinsky and Joyce. The period is often said to start as early as Courbet and the Impressionists and last in varying degrees until the Warhol and Pop Art era. Warhol being seen as the Father of Post-Modernism to a certain extant.

I think Robert Hughes 'The Shock Of The New' really documents 'Modernism' well. But I love John Berger's Ways Of Seeing much more!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShV1h85dnkc

Posted

Modern to me, and it is my personal preference, corresponds with the boom period of Ivy style and modern jazz: running from around 1955 to 1964, some would push it further to 1967 and earlier back to 1952. I wouldn't argue against that!

Posted

Sometimes I think that the only true "modern" is that which is happening than nobody's figured out enough about to label "modern".

That might be extreme, but maybe not...especially if capturing is necessary for labeling, and labeling is necessary for selling (If not the thing, then the discussion about the thing).

Maybe that's it - modern is those "things" which have not yet been identified as things.

Or not. There's a lot of ways to look at things. Such as this.

Posted

In my early years of jazz listening at the end of the fifties, the word "modern" featured as a jazz category and was used by record stores, etc., along with "traditional" and "mainstream", the latter denoting jazz by musicians of Buck Clayton's generation. Some record stores also had a "progressive" category, which seemed to consist of discs by Kenton and Shorty Rogers. All this, of course, was before the category "avant garde" emerged. Biggest sellers in the "modern jazz" category were Brubeck and the MJQ. In Britain these subdivisions were reinforced by a virtual war between "traddies" and "modernists".

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...