BERIGAN Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 (edited) NEWS IN ENGLISH -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INCREASING PROBLEM: Swedes have more and more animal sex Av Øyvind Ludt og Carin Pettersson 26.01.04 12:24 Animal sex is not illegal in Sweden, and every year between 200 and 300 pets are injured because of sexual assaults. The estimate was presented by Svenska Veterinärforbundet, the Swedish veterinary organization, and it is now trying to make the authorities and the public more aware of animals’ suffering. The organization claim the problem has increased during the last couple of years, even if most people are unaware of it. “We have seen an increase since 1999 when child pornography became illegal,” said Johan Beck-Friis. “It appears, in other words, as there are some people who have replaced children with animals. In both circumstances, it is sex with defenceless individuals.” The injuries inflicted on animals after sexual assaults are of the same character of those children get. Beck-Friis said that the most common injuries are wounds on the sex organs and blisters. Animal porn The fact that animal sex is becoming an increasing problem can be indicated by the mere fact that there is an increasing selection of animal porn at video rentals and there an increasingly number of websites with animal pornography is surfacing. No one knows for sure how many animals that are abused, but a British study from 2001 indicates that every 20th dog or cat that receives treatment at veterinaries, the injuries are not a result of a direct accident, but the animal has been inflicted the injury as a result of a sexual assault. According to the Swedish paper Expressen, if the same estimate can be used in Sweden that will indicate that 200 to 300 dogs and cats every year are injured as a result of sexual assaults. Not illegal In contrast with most other countries, animal sex is not illegal in Sweden. It was decriminalized in 1944 in connection with the decriminalization of homosexual sex. Edited January 29, 2004 by BERIGAN Quote
Free For All Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 Maybe we should ask Swinging Swede just how he came to choose that name. No pun intended. Quote
Claude Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 (edited) Weird Sex Laws : In Lebanon, men are legally allowed to have sex with animals, but the animals must be female. Having sexual relations with a male animal is punishable by death. Edited January 29, 2004 by Claude Quote
maren Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 Weird Sex Laws : In Lebanon, men are legally allowed to have sex with animals, but the animals must be female. Having sexual relations with a male animal is punishable by death. Hokey Smoke, Bullwinkle! Quote
patricia Posted January 30, 2004 Report Posted January 30, 2004 Weird Sex Laws : In Lebanon, men are legally allowed to have sex with animals, but the animals must be female. Having sexual relations with a male animal is punishable by death. Hokey Smoke, Bullwinkle! That would tie in with some men's reluctance to have their male pets neutered. My theory is that they identify with male dogs and cats and other male animals and that their ambivilance toward women, hence female pets is carried forward. This would be much the same as some men thinking that rape of women and girls is not so heinous as rape of men and boys is. Again, an identification and personalization of the victim with themselves. Quote
RDK Posted January 30, 2004 Report Posted January 30, 2004 So straight animal sex is okay, but gay animal sex is frowned upon? Quote
Jim Alfredson Posted January 30, 2004 Report Posted January 30, 2004 This is nasty. I can only imagine what those conservatives who against homosexual unions here in the US will do with this gem: In contrast with most other countries, animal sex is not illegal in Sweden. It was decriminalized in 1944 in connection with the decriminalization of homosexual sex. Should do wonders for the cause. Quote
Jazzmoose Posted January 30, 2004 Report Posted January 30, 2004 My god, that's disgusting! At least here in the United States we have the decency to use farm animals instead of pets, as the Maker intended! Perverted European scum! Quote
Christiern Posted January 30, 2004 Report Posted January 30, 2004 Now I understand why there was that special gleam in the eyes of a cow I almost ran down on the outskirts of Göteborg! Quote
neveronfriday Posted January 30, 2004 Report Posted January 30, 2004 (edited) Now I understand why there was that special gleam in the eyes of a cow I almost ran down on the outskirts of Göteborg! Sorry, but your assumption is wrong. That was a cow that had taken the ferry to Denmark to get drunk on some much cheaper and readily available booze. Cheers! Note: It was indestinguishable from the other drunk Swedes loitering about Copenhagen (which is pretty much the case all year round). The only defining characteristic was probably that the cow was unable to pull a trolley with several crates of beer around, as the Swedes often do. Makes them easy targets and much more fun to play with ... Edited January 30, 2004 by deus62 Quote
connoisseur series500 Posted January 30, 2004 Report Posted January 30, 2004 Even that thread on cannibalism was less gross than this stuff! Quote
patricia Posted January 30, 2004 Report Posted January 30, 2004 Even that thread on cannibalism was less gross than this stuff! There was a thread on cannibalism?? Quote
rockefeller center Posted January 30, 2004 Report Posted January 30, 2004 Even that thread on cannibalism was less gross than this stuff! There was a thread on cannibalism?? Enjoy... http://www.organissimo.org/forum/index.php...&hl=cannibalism Quote
Jazzmoose Posted January 30, 2004 Report Posted January 30, 2004 (edited) Hey, this is a well-rounded board, Patricia! We hit all the major issues. The reading material on the toilet thread made a big splash as well! Edited January 30, 2004 by Jazzmoose Quote
Jim Alfredson Posted January 30, 2004 Report Posted January 30, 2004 "No, no Mr. Moose!! Please don't put me in there!!!!" Quote
Aggie87 Posted January 30, 2004 Report Posted January 30, 2004 Now I understand why there was that special gleam in the eyes of a cow I almost ran down on the outskirts of Göteborg! Sorry, but your assumption is wrong. That was a cow that had taken the ferry to Denmark to get drunk on some much cheaper and readily available booze. Cheers! Note: It was indestinguishable from the other drunk Swedes loitering about Copenhagen (which is pretty much the case all year round). The only defining characteristic was probably that the cow was unable to pull a trolley with several crates of beer around, as the Swedes often do. Makes them easy targets and much more fun to play with ... Maybe the cows head to Denmark to booze it up, but it's well known in the rest of Scandinavia that the sheep make annual trips down to Hamburg, mainly so they can party down on the Reeperbaa-aa-aa-n... .....sorry bout that. Quote
patricia Posted January 30, 2004 Report Posted January 30, 2004 (edited) Hey, this is a well-rounded board, Patricia! We hit all the major issues. The reading material on the toilet thread made a big splash as well! Thank you rockefeller center and Jazzmoose. Yes. All the major issues. No subject undiscussed. Love this board!!! Edited January 30, 2004 by patricia Quote
Rooster_Ties Posted January 30, 2004 Report Posted January 30, 2004 (edited) Re: the article that started this thread... Neither of my cats will even let me touch their paws in order to clip their claws, and one of them won't even let me lightly touch her back paws (or her belly) – even for 1/10 of a second – without her claws and teeth coming out, full force. And, come to think of it, NONE of the cats I've ever had were really much different. SO, I can't imagine any cat putting up with any kind of sexual shenanigans, for even 2 seconds. So, either the "cats and dogs" aspect of the article is really "mostly dogs, plus two or three loose cats". Or, maybe (more likely) the article is simply total bullshit. Edited January 30, 2004 by Rooster_Ties Quote
patricia Posted January 30, 2004 Report Posted January 30, 2004 Re: the article that started this thread... Neither of my cats will even let me touch their paws in order to clip their claws, and one of them won't even let me lightly touch her back paws (or her belly) – even for 1/10 of a second – without her claws and teeth coming out, full force. And, come to think of it, NONE of the cats I've ever had were really much different. SO, I can't imagine any cat putting up with any kind of sexual shenanigans, for even 2 seconds. So, either the "cats and dogs" aspect of the article is really "mostly dogs, plus two or three loose cats". Or, maybe (more likely) the article is simply total bullshit. Absolutely. Cats trust NOBODY. They let you live in *their* house. Dogs are favour-curriers, with a few exceptions. The very qualities that we admire in dogs, their loyalty, their obedience, are their downfall. Few cats can be trained to do anything that they hadn't already decided, on their own, to do. The reason that cats are never used as guides for the blind is that no blind person relishes the idea of being dragged up on top of the cupboards in the kitchen for a nap. So, trying anything *funny* with them is an invitation to an flurry of claws and fur. Quote
Rooster_Ties Posted January 30, 2004 Report Posted January 30, 2004 Lesson: Don't fuck with cats. Figuratively, or literally!!! Quote
Jazzmoose Posted January 30, 2004 Report Posted January 30, 2004 Oh, come on; cats can be easily trained. All four of ours have mastered the "sleep" command, and three have been able to figure out "ignore". One is just too darned curious... Quote
Jazzmoose Posted January 30, 2004 Report Posted January 30, 2004 And I'm pretending I didn't see that post, Jim! Quote
Jim Alfredson Posted January 30, 2004 Report Posted January 30, 2004 Pretend all you want. We know the truth. Quote
Free For All Posted January 30, 2004 Report Posted January 30, 2004 Lesson: Don't fuck with cats. Figuratively, or literally!!! I don't even see how it would be anatomically possible. That'd be like trying to put a marshmallow in a piggy bank. Or so I hear. "Here kitty kitty..............................." Quote
_forumlogo.png.a607ef20a6e0c299ab2aa6443aa1f32e.png)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.