Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just finished a couple of Simon Brett Fethering mysteries: The Shooting in the Shop and Bones under the Bach Hut. The former disappointed, but the latter is one of his best and quite brave towards the end in some of the opinions he expresses.

Now reading Big Money by P.G. Wodehouse, and it's a corker: rather anarchic and irreverent but very witty; not too much romance (so far). Wodehouse at his best really.

Must read something literary soon...

  • Replies 9.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

I always found Unsworth a chore to read. "Sacred Humger" suffered from entropy to my way of reading.

His books vary wildly. Sacred Hunger is work, but worth it. Morality Play is a breeze. After Hannibal is a hoot.

Posted

Finished reading Five Seasons by A. B. Yehoshua. Really hard to understand how this made the Man Booker list (maybe just the longlist though). I found it a total damp squib of a book. The main character has been taking care of his wife when she finally dies of complications from breast cancer. It then traces his misadventures over the next five seasons as he sort of comes back into the realm of dating and considering remarriage. I found the character to be fairly unlikeable, obsessed with money and to a slightly lesser degree status. To some extent, his profession (accounts auditor) does reinforce these tendencies. But beyond this, almost everyone in the book has a very mercenary approach to relationships (ranging from a professional matchmaker who contacts him too early to his old camp counselor, who has an unusual proposition for him). Frankly, I would consider it on the anti-Semitic side if it hadn't been written by an Israeli. Certainly not my thing.

On the positive side, I have finally cracked Skvorecky's The Engineer of Human Souls and am enjoying it tremendously. What a relief after a summer of largely disappointing novels (though the poetry has generally been fun to read). This is a fairly epic novel, and is probably best considered Skvorecky's fictional autobiography. The main character (Danny) is an unambitious professor of literature in suburban Toronto with a troubled past (he had been forced to work for the Nazi war efforts in occupied Czechoslovakia). The action shifts back and forth between his memories of these times (including a hair-brained scheme to damage some German war planes) and his interactions with his students as well as the exiled Czech community in Toronto. I didn't realize until recently that this novel was written in 1977, so long, long before the Velvet Revolution (and indeed not all that long after the war). I haven't reached the section where Danny escapes and his other friends don't make it out (including a figure who is clearly supposed to stand in for Vaclav Havel). Definitely a good read so far.

Posted

Just finished another Wodehouse: Doctor Sally. Adapted from a play, which makes it more interesting (in a technical sense) than especially good. At least it was short, and would have been even shorter if he hadn't padded it out with so much repeated dialogue, eg, "I'm angry" "You're angry?" "I'm angry."

I'm working through the gaps in my Wodehouse knowledge. Hot Water is chronologically the next unread title, so I'll read that then possibly look for something more substantial.

Posted

At least it was short, and would have been even shorter if he hadn't padded it out with so much repeated dialogue, eg, "I'm angry" "You're angry?" "I'm angry."

Maybe someone could do a dissertation on the Wodehouse influence on Pinter's dialogue.

Posted

Just finished another Wodehouse: Doctor Sally. Adapted from a play, which makes it more interesting (in a technical sense) than especially good. At least it was short, and would have been even shorter if he hadn't padded it out with so much repeated dialogue, eg, "I'm angry" "You're angry?" "I'm angry."

I'm working through the gaps in my Wodehouse knowledge. Hot Water is chronologically the next unread title, so I'll read that then possibly look for something more substantial.

At one point in the 80's I methodically worked my way through about 40 Wodehouse novels. I love Wodehouse, but I'd be the first to admit that I probably won't ever re-read quite a few of those.

Posted

I started reading him because I liked the Everyman hardback editions and fancied collecting them. I was rather unenthusiastic about his writing at first, being an English graduate used to literary fiction, but as I kept buying them and reading them I gradually began to get it.

Much of his humour is about repetition, such as using lofty quotes to describe facetious situations, and you also laugh whenever one you've seen in one story recurs in another. Just reading a list of them, such as the one here, makes me smile. I can do without the repetitive dialogue, however.

Posted

Because of a number of posts about Philip K. Dick, I picked up In Milton Lumky Territory at our local library book sale.

Not his most dynamic novel, but an interesting one!

Posted

On the positive side, I have finally cracked Skvorecky's The Engineer of Human Souls and am enjoying it tremendously. ... This is a fairly epic novel, and is probably best considered Skvorecky's fictional autobiography.

Still enjoying this, but it is so long, and I seem to have so little time to read (mostly just the bus two or three days a week -- other days I bike to work, which is great exercise but not so good for reading).

I have been reading or perhaps more accurately skimming a great deal of poetry, trying to uncover interesting transportation-related poetry. I've just submitted the project to a publisher but figure I can still tweak the table of contents a bit if they decide they are interested in proceeding.

As a bit of a lark, I also picked up Pitouie by Derek Winkler, which is about an island in the middle of the Pacific that is being pitched as the perfect garbage disposal site by its corporate owners. It looks like a fun, fairly quick read.

Posted

Waugh - Men at Arms

Are you planning on reading the trilogy in one go? I haven't tackled this, and indeed, currently it is packed up (only a small portion of Waugh is on the shelves at present). I guess I am afraid of a let-down. Several people/reviewers told me that Ford Maddox Ford's Parade's End was his finest achievement, far outshining The Good Soldier, but I found it turgid and flat and barely made it through. There could be many reasons for my reaction, though in general I don't like reading war stories, or at least traditional ones. I was moved by Nemirovsky's Suite Francais.

Posted

Waugh - Men at Arms

Are you planning on reading the trilogy in one go? I haven't tackled this, and indeed, currently it is packed up (only a small portion of Waugh is on the shelves at present). I guess I am afraid of a let-down. Several people/reviewers told me that Ford Maddox Ford's Parade's End was his finest achievement, far outshining The Good Soldier, but I found it turgid and flat and barely made it through. There could be many reasons for my reaction, though in general I don't like reading war stories, or at least traditional ones. I was moved by Nemirovsky's Suite Francais.

You have to read the trilogy, it's my favorite Waugh, especially Men At Arms, where everything comes under Waugh's cynical eye. No wonder the military gave him leave to write a book, I can only imagine what he must have been like as an officer. Indeed, in Waugh's world, God cares very much about the English Catholic Aristocracy!

Posted

This is a return to a book I read and really enjoyed some years ago. Curiously though, I wasn't able to get into the second and third books in the trilogy - don't know why. So I won't be moving on to those - will probably take up another Barbara Pym.

Posted

Not long ago I read Lies, Inc. by Philip K. Dick. It turned out to be The Unteleported Man with a middle section added, at a publisher's demand, to pad it out, make it longer. The new middle section was written some long time after the original novel and is a description of a long, static drug trip that has no relevance to the original story.

There's so much of this stuff in Dick and from the reviews his writings on "theology"/"philosophy" must be impenetrable. Why on earth do some people consider him a Thinker? Okay, so he took drugs and saw God. Can't they take their own drugs and see God themselves, firsthand, instead of relying on Dick? A biography of Dick indicates he made all this stuff up as a middle-aged guy in order to impress naive young ladies.

One of his best is Confessions Of A Crap Artist. Great vivid characters in this novel. The villainess was said to have been based on Dick's ex-wife. Apart from his drugged-out stuff his stories always grabbed me.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member


×
×
  • Create New...