Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Still revisting my youth. Finished rereading David Gerrold's The Man Who Folded Himself, which was a strange experience. Apparently he's revised the novel to reflect things that have changed since he first wrote it, which would be completely ridiculous in any other novel, but with this one, it adds to the unreality of it all. Still a ridiculous practice if you ask me; one that shows not even the author takes this stuff seriously. As many times as I've recommended this book in the past, I can no longer do so. But take that as an 'old and cranky' comment.

What the ever-lovin' Hell? Why on God's green earth would someone "revise" a novel like The Man Who Folded Himself? It sounds remarkably wrongheaded. What are the differences? Does the eponymous time-traveling hero refer to President Bush? Sad to hear that Gerrold would mess up his own book like that.

I reread a good part of the novel about 10 years back. I hadn't read it since I was in 9th grade, so the only thing strange that time was getting a more adult perspective on the old book.

  • Replies 9.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

alarecherchedutempsperdu.jpgBefore I get too senile might as well start reading some classics.Think I'll finish it when summer comes along if everything goes well.

Good luck.

I just had to read Madame Bovary for our book club.

Drove me crazy.

Happy to get back to contemporary writing.

Posted

It's really silly stuff, like mentioning the WTC twin towers 'still standing' at one point, the character 'listening to CDs', and such; stuff that adds absolutely nothing to the book.

Sheesh, what's the point? Just seems misguided to me. Too bad.

Posted (edited)

Finally finished Narayan's The English Teacher -- I kind of lost steam about 60% in when he starts communicating with dead spirits (and apparently this isn't supposed to be taken ironically, i.e. look how silly he is taken in by these charlatans). Still, it is hard to be too hard on a novel that is essentially a love letter to his recently departed wife (she died very young in real life, just as the character does).

Mahfouz's The Beginning and the End -- a page-turner, practically Dickensian in the way he covers a family's descent into poverty after the unexpected death of the father. Obviously depressing of course.

Am partway through Nabokov's Despair as well. Just am not enjoying Nabokov at any level at all. I'll try to wrap this one up as well as Invitation to a Beheading. If I don't warm up to him (and I don't think I will), I will read Lolita and then get rid of all the rest of the novels (I bought the LoA Nabokov set, but am kind of ruing that now).

Edited by ejp626
Posted

Adam Levin: The Instructions

How is this? I'm probably going to tackle it next year, but it looks like a book I'd only read once, so I am struggling not to buy it with a 33% off coupon or something.

Anyway, I just wrapped up Mahfouz's The Beginning and the End. Towards the end it looks like it is about to become An American Tragedy set in Egypt, but it doesn't (which is good as I actually didn't care for Dreiser's tale too much) and it goes somewhere darker actually. Quite a good book on the whole, but depressing.

Just thought I would share a rant on Ted Hughes' The Iron Giant. I've known about it for a long time, though I never read it or watched the animated film. Anyway, it looked age-appropriate for my son, so I checked it out. I hated it. I thought so much was wrong with it, including the absurdity of having a star/ship travel from somewhere in the Orion constellation to Earth in a matter of months, and all kinds of other bogus physics, then the sadomasochism and the slave imagery, then the simpering wish fulfillment at the end where the space dragon sings the music of the stars and the people of earth lose their war-like tendencies. In short, I hated everything about it and was heartily sorry I'd picked it up. I do wonder what the movie is like, however, as I simply can't believe they could have been that faithful to the original.

Posted

I'm a third of the way through The Instructions (1030 pages total).

To me it's a fascinating novel.

Obviously some will be put off by the length.

Some familiarity with a lot of the Jewish references will help.

Posted

I'm a third of the way through The Instructions (1030 pages total).

To me it's a fascinating novel.

Obviously some will be put off by the length.

Some familiarity with a lot of the Jewish references will help.

I'm still very much on the fence. I am sure I won't read it twice, if I read it at all, so I'll just have to be patient and sign up for a copy from the library in the spring.

I really didn't understand all the fuss about Kalooki Nights (a fairly big deal in British Jewish literature from 2007). I just didn't enjoy it at all, but the reviewers just lapped it up (as they did with Jacobson's Booker-winning The Finkler Question). I have a fairly strong suspicion that I would be feeling the same way at the end of The Instructions -- meh. That's a lot of reading for little reward. I felt the same way about The Savage Detectives (no way was my effort fully rewarded) and I'm feeling that way about Nabokov now. I'm clearly moving away from a certain kind of ultra-literary fiction as I age. Still, I generally enjoy Jonathan Lethem and Michael Chabon, who are sort of in the same circle.

Posted

n2031.jpg

I know that people rag on the Gateway sequels, but I think they're quite good.

Wow, nearing the conclusion of this one, and I really have to say the three sequels I found quite interesting. Very interesting about "machine intelligence," and the prescient discussion of terrorism, and I really was intrigued by the idea of an enemy race of energy beings who were trying to recreate the universe without matter.

And. . . spoiler below. . . ..

I was totally blown away how at the end of the third book you realize your friendly neighborhood narrator. . . has been dead the whole time he's narrating to you!

Posted

5102ZF98GDL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

Nearing the end of this 650 page tome.

Loved it.

I'm told that those who like this book will like A Visit From The Goon Squad (which I'm going to try as soon as I finish The Instructions).

Posted

In 1982 I started reading Life After Life by Raymond Moody. I found it very interesting, but half way through it I moved from Pittsburgh to York, and the book was lost in the move.

I recently picked up a copy, and I've started it tonight. I'm looking forward to reading the whole thing now.

Posted

alarecherchedutempsperdu.jpgBefore I get too senile might as well start reading some classics.Think I'll finish it when summer comes along if everything goes well.

I am looking to get into Proust in 2012, maybe help distract myself from everything else going to pot.

Anyway, for a classic classic I've been reading Erasmus's The Praise of Folly. Not a gut-buster, but it has its moments.

I've demoted Nabokov to the benches for the time being and am replacing him with Kamila Shamsie. She doesn't have that many novels, so then I'll read two by Uzma Aslam Khan, and then see how I feel about inserting Nabokov back into the line-up. I have, however, been enjoying Mahfouz and generally Narayan, so they will stay in. It is kind of a nice change: a year of reading almost entirely non-Western fiction.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...