Larry Kart Posted August 8, 2012 Report Posted August 8, 2012 http://www.jazzwax.com./ Today's part 3 has much of interest to say about Mulligan and Baker -- their personalities and respective talents. Whitlock, as he explains in part 2, was the person who brought Baker into the group. Quote
GA Russell Posted August 9, 2012 Report Posted August 9, 2012 Thanks, Larry. I've bookmarked it. Quote
Big Beat Steve Posted August 9, 2012 Report Posted August 9, 2012 Yes - very interesting. Thank you!! Quote
AllenLowe Posted August 9, 2012 Report Posted August 9, 2012 (edited) great interview, and confirms my general impression of Mulligan, whose playing I haven't liked since the first time I heard it at age 14. I actually don't even think he's that interesting as a composer. His whole ouevre has always struck me as mediocre mainstream work disguised as non-confirmity. though, as you know, I am in a very small minority in thinking this. Edited August 9, 2012 by AllenLowe Quote
Head Man Posted August 9, 2012 Report Posted August 9, 2012 great interview, and confirms my general impression of Mulligan, whose playing I haven't liked since the first time I heard it at age 14. I actually don't even think he's that interesting as a composer. His whole ouevre has always struck me as mediocre mainstream work disguised as non-confirmity. though, as you know, I am in a very small minority in thinking this. A minority of one? Quote
colinmce Posted August 9, 2012 Report Posted August 9, 2012 To each their own! But I dunno if I really buy the non-conformity angle; I sure don't see Mulligan selling that. The 50s were chock full of reliable mainstream composers and arrangers, and I think Gerry's one of the very best. He's not George Russell, but he was never trying to be. As far as his playing, I can't speak to his ideas but I know I could just listen to him go forever. Quote
AllenLowe Posted August 9, 2012 Report Posted August 9, 2012 what I mean is that he placed himself in the avant garde of that era - but was really very ordinary, both as a composer/arranger and soloist. Compare him to Johnny Carisi, whose work was edgy and pushing things - Mulligan was just middle of the road. Quote
colinmce Posted August 9, 2012 Report Posted August 9, 2012 I can agree with that. But as far as MOR goes it doesn't get much better. Quote
Larry Kart Posted August 9, 2012 Author Report Posted August 9, 2012 Allen -- We've exchanged view son Mulligan before, I think, but to me he was always very charming and quite individual as a composer/arranger and at his best a good deal more than that (e.g. his sublime version of "All the Things You Are" for Columbia). As a soloist I thought he was, as Whitlock says, rather formulaic, and not a patch on Chaloff, Gullin, Bob Gordon, et al. during his years of peak celebrity, but he did get a good deal better/less formulaic as a soloist in his later years. Quote
Chuck Nessa Posted August 10, 2012 Report Posted August 10, 2012 but he did get a good deal better/less formulaic as a soloist in his later years. I had lost interest by then. Quote
AllenLowe Posted August 10, 2012 Report Posted August 10, 2012 yes, I am a recidivist in my views on Mulligan; and I like all of the bari players Larry named. Quote
robertoart Posted August 23, 2012 Report Posted August 23, 2012 (edited) Was he on this one? And did we find out if he was a 'natural' redhead? Edited August 23, 2012 by freelancer Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.