Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

hey u guys was just jammin out to my new old 1st pressing of TALKIN ABOUT and in the noted l. feather mentions how larry was giggin around ny with hank, KD, tommy turrentine, and im just thinkin how awesome that would be see a live set of hank + larry on his b3. they only did that one album together, isnt that right, i want to hold your hand. definetly a pop affair. hank n larry live must of aboustely tore it freaking up.

Posted

  On 12/8/2011 at 4:55 AM, chewy said:

hey u guys was just jammin out to my new old 1st pressing of TALKIN ABOUT and in the noted l. feather mentions how larry was giggin around ny with hank, KD, tommy turrentine, and im just thinkin how awesome that would be see a live set of hank + larry on his b3. they only did that one album together, isnt that right, i want to hold your hand. definetly a pop affair. hank n larry live must of aboustely tore it freaking up.

Not sure they were a good match... Larry was a better fit with the post-Coltrane saxophonists.

Posted

  On 12/8/2011 at 12:55 PM, Guy said:

  On 12/8/2011 at 4:55 AM, chewy said:

hey u guys was just jammin out to my new old 1st pressing of TALKIN ABOUT and in the noted l. feather mentions how larry was giggin around ny with hank, KD, tommy turrentine, and im just thinkin how awesome that would be see a live set of hank + larry on his b3. they only did that one album together, isnt that right, i want to hold your hand. definetly a pop affair. hank n larry live must of aboustely tore it freaking up.

Not sure they were a good match... Larry was a better fit with the post-Coltrane saxophonists.

Exactly, although Hank had adopted some post Trane techniques, I think his ideas and style were too rooted in bop and hard bop vocabulary, whereas someone like Joe Henderson who complete embraced the inside outside approach was a better fit.

Posted (edited)

  On 12/8/2011 at 7:36 PM, Free For All said:

He changed "would of" to "would have" in the title! Way to go chewy! :g

It may have been one of the moderators who did that :)

Edited by J.A.W.
Posted

  On 12/8/2011 at 7:39 PM, J.A.W. said:

  On 12/8/2011 at 7:36 PM, Free For All said:

He changed "would of" to "would have" in the title! Way to go chewy! :g

It may have been one of the moderators who did that :)

that would of been kind of a lame thing to do, though...

Posted

  On 12/8/2011 at 9:15 PM, king ubu said:

  On 12/8/2011 at 7:39 PM, J.A.W. said:

  On 12/8/2011 at 7:36 PM, Free For All said:

He changed "would of" to "would have" in the title! Way to go chewy! :g

It may have been one of the moderators who did that :)

that would of been kind of a lame thing to do, though...

I totally disagree. I think everyone, but especially the native English speakers here, should try to use correct English which can be understood by all, including those whose first language isn't English and may have trouble understanding mangled English.

Posted

  On 12/8/2011 at 11:14 PM, J.A.W. said:

  On 12/8/2011 at 9:15 PM, king ubu said:

  On 12/8/2011 at 7:39 PM, J.A.W. said:

  On 12/8/2011 at 7:36 PM, Free For All said:

He changed "would of" to "would have" in the title! Way to go chewy! :g

It may have been one of the moderators who did that :)

that would of been kind of a lame thing to do, though...

I totally disagree. I think everyone, but especially the native English speakers here, should try to use correct English which can be understood by all, including those whose first language isn't English and may have trouble understanding mangled English.

I'm with Ubu. The original heading was correct for the (presumed)text.

Posted

  On 12/8/2011 at 11:57 PM, Chuck Nessa said:

  On 12/8/2011 at 11:14 PM, J.A.W. said:

  On 12/8/2011 at 9:15 PM, king ubu said:

  On 12/8/2011 at 7:39 PM, J.A.W. said:

  On 12/8/2011 at 7:36 PM, Free For All said:

He changed "would of" to "would have" in the title! Way to go chewy! :g

It may have been one of the moderators who did that :)

that would of been kind of a lame thing to do, though...

I totally disagree. I think everyone, but especially the native English speakers here, should try to use correct English which can be understood by all, including those whose first language isn't English and may have trouble understanding mangled English.

I'm with Ubu. The original heading was correct for the (presumed)text.

Well, yes, but it's possible that the illiteracy of Chewy-speak is more or less a put-on or a mask, a la Moms' persona. Presumed, indeed.

  On 12/8/2011 at 11:52 PM, Christiern said:

Why do you care who Mobley lived with? Or Young, for that matter. Grown men (and women) can cohabit with whoever makes them feel at home—don't you think? :unsure:

Took me a beat to get it, but :rofl:

Posted

  On 12/9/2011 at 1:49 AM, Larry Kart said:

  On 12/8/2011 at 11:52 PM, Christiern said:

Why do you care who Mobley lived with? Or Young, for that matter. Grown men (and women) can cohabit with whoever makes them feel at home—don't you think? :unsure:

Took me a beat to get it, but :rofl:

Same here; very funny :lol:

Posted

Wasn't Aric a law student in the Seattle area at one point? Wouldn't that make you more, not less aware when it comes the clarity of your oral or written communication? Writing never reflects on anyone anymore than it does on the writer. That's why I don't hit "send" unless I'm sure something is as well written as I can make it. I have no problem with a moderator correcting the wording of a post.

Posted

  On 12/9/2011 at 10:52 PM, Dave James said:

Wasn't Aric a law student in the Seattle area at one point? Wouldn't that make you more, not less aware when it comes the clarity of your oral or written communication? Writing never reflects on anyone anymore than it does on the writer. That's why I don't hit "send" unless I'm sure something is as well written as I can make it. I have no problem with a moderator correcting the wording of a post.

I wholeheartedly agree with your approach. Unfortunately, law student or not, I believe that alcohol played a large part in the clarity (or lack thereof) of the written communication. I am not sure if it still does.

Posted

  On 12/8/2011 at 4:55 AM, chewy said:
they only did that one album together, isnt that right, i want to hold your hand. definetly a pop affair.

Pop? Like Sinatra w/Ernie Freeman? Or what,exactly? Creed Taylor Wes?

Other than the cuts being familiar tunes at reasonable airplay length, I don't think so.

But otherwise, I think it would have been a cool mix, especially later Hank with later Larry, playing Hank's tunes in some club in Newark with Eddie Gladden on drums. Just a trio.

Hell, I know that woulda have worked.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

  On 12/9/2011 at 1:49 AM, Larry Kart said:
it's possible that the illiteracy of Chewy-speak is more or less a put-on or a mask, a la Moms' persona.

That is actually what I have been inclined to think. Which makes "would have" seem 'wrong', coming from chewy... :)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...