Tim McG Posted February 27, 2012 Author Report Posted February 27, 2012 Marlins and Nats are spending money like 2012 is really it for Planet Earth. Do they really have the money or this is just a big gamble? Gamble. As I understand it, both teams play in a small market. I'm guessing that both clubs have mortgaged the future ala SF Forty-Niners to pay players now. Quote
JSngry Posted February 28, 2012 Report Posted February 28, 2012 Ryan Braun's sample collector releases a statement. http://mlb.sbnation.com/2012/2/28/2831135/ryan-braun-sample-collector-dino-laurenzi Quote
Soulstation1 Posted February 29, 2012 Report Posted February 29, 2012 They shouldn't get samples over the weekend Quote
Neal Pomea Posted February 29, 2012 Report Posted February 29, 2012 (edited) Wonder if Braun's protest is going to soon look like Raphael Palmeiro's finger-wagging at Congress. Columbian District is more of a mid-sized market, according to this: http://www.baseball-almanac.com/articles/baseball_markets.shtml Markets of 5-10 million people -------------------------------------------------------- 7,608,070 Baltimore Orioles, Washington Nationals However this fails to take into account that while Washingtonians can and have rooted for Baltimore teams (football and baseball) in the past, Baltimore natives NEVER root for Washington teams. So in a sense Baltimore has a larger market than Washington. Believe it or not. Factor in our local sports reporters and radio personalities and their outspoken contempt for baseball in general and you've got to wonder. And Washington is not really a regional team the same way Boston is loved in much of New England and even the Maritime provinces of Canada. I remember watching Red Sox baseball in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia a few summers ago! Edited February 29, 2012 by Neal Pomea Quote
PHILLYQ Posted February 29, 2012 Report Posted February 29, 2012 Bad news for Met fans- Fred Wilpon says in the NY Post today that he(and his family) intend to own the Mets for a long time. Quote
Dave James Posted February 29, 2012 Report Posted February 29, 2012 Bobby V talkin' trash at Jason Varitek's retirement press conference. http://espn.go.com/boston/mlb/story/_/id/7626289/2012-spring-training-bobby-valentine-takes-jabs-new-york-yankees-alex-rodriguez-derek-jeter Quote
Dave James Posted February 29, 2012 Report Posted February 29, 2012 Ryan Braun's sample collector releases a statement. http://mlb.sbnation.com/2012/2/28/2831135/ryan-braun-sample-collector-dino-laurenzi Like I said earlier, a chain of custody issue that MLB will do nothing about. Braun's sample had seven times the normal level of testosterone. He's going to get away with this on a technicality / loophole, but he's still guilty and everyone knows it. The guy who took the sample has done this hundreds, if not thousands of times. Don't tell me he doesn't know what he's doing and how you go about ensuring that samples are not tampered with. This is total B.S. (bullshit, not Bud Selig, although the acronyms are interchangeable). Quote
JETman Posted February 29, 2012 Report Posted February 29, 2012 Ryan Braun's sample collector releases a statement. http://mlb.sbnation.com/2012/2/28/2831135/ryan-braun-sample-collector-dino-laurenzi Like I said earlier, a chain of custody issue that MLB will do nothing about. Braun's sample had seven times the normal level of testosterone. He's going to get away with this on a technicality / loophole, but he's still guilty and everyone knows it. The guy who took the sample has done this hundreds, if not thousands of times. Don't tell me he doesn't know what he's doing and how you go about ensuring that samples are not tampered with. This is total B.S. (bullshit, not Bud Selig, although the acronyms are interchangeable). Especially since Bud used to own the Brew Crew. Quote
Tim McG Posted February 29, 2012 Author Report Posted February 29, 2012 (edited) Ryan Braun's sample collector releases a statement. http://mlb.sbnation.com/2012/2/28/2831135/ryan-braun-sample-collector-dino-laurenzi Like I said earlier, a chain of custody issue that MLB will do nothing about. Braun's sample had seven times the normal level of testosterone. He's going to get away with this on a technicality / loophole, but he's still guilty and everyone knows it. The guy who took the sample has done this hundreds, if not thousands of times. Don't tell me he doesn't know what he's doing and how you go about ensuring that samples are not tampered with. This is total B.S. (bullshit, not Bud Selig, although the acronyms are interchangeable). Especially since Bud used to own the Brew Crew. That's the fact, too. Edited February 29, 2012 by GoodSpeak Quote
BERIGAN Posted March 1, 2012 Report Posted March 1, 2012 I am from the future. I remember when Giancarlo Stanton was known as Mike Stanton. Quote
BERIGAN Posted March 1, 2012 Report Posted March 1, 2012 very interesting story of a braves catching prospect, who is 25 and in A ball.... http://blogs.ajc.com/atlanta-braves-blog/2012/02/29/braves-slugger-gattis-has-a-story-man-does-he-ever/?cxntfid=blogs_atlanta_braves_blog Quote
Dave James Posted March 2, 2012 Report Posted March 2, 2012 Reports have surfaced that a number of MLB players are upset with developments in the Ryan Braun case. This is a guy who we now know, beyond the shadow of a doubt, took steroids and yet, because of ambiguous language in the CBA, has been fully exonerated. The question of "did he or didn't he" should not be obscured by technicalities. It's all that matters. If Bud Selig had any stones, he'd step in and do the right thing. That he doesn't and he won't makes it abundantly clear that he's nothing but a tool. I can assure you that neither Bart Giamatti or Fay Vincent would have let this stand. Quote
Brad Posted March 2, 2012 Report Posted March 2, 2012 I don't know what you mean by "step in". There is a CBA which prescribes how things are supposed to work. You just can't overrule CBA, unless that is permitted. Also, the word "technicalities" is a word a person uses when he doesn't like the result. I see fellow lawyers use that all the time but if a rule or procedure isn't followed that's a breach of the rule and a contrary result, but for the violation of the rule, can't be justified. Quote
JSngry Posted March 2, 2012 Report Posted March 2, 2012 Did Braun test positive for steroids or for HGH? Or are they the same thing? I didn't think they were, but am in no way even semi-certain about that... Either way, it's a violation, but if there's a difference, I think it's important to keep the terminology accurate. Quote
Dan Gould Posted March 2, 2012 Report Posted March 2, 2012 In the World According to Dave James, Bud Selig is the epitome of evil. In the real world, there is a CBA, and a drug testing regime negotiated and agreed to by the parties. It includes a process for ajudicating disputes. There is nothing Bud Selig can do. Its not up to him to 'stand for' anything. And news flash for Dave: There is no "good of the game" clause giving a commissioner power to dictate results. Quote
Tim McG Posted March 2, 2012 Author Report Posted March 2, 2012 (edited) In the World According to Dave James, Bud Selig is the epitome of evil. In the real world, there is a CBA, and a drug testing regime negotiated and agreed to by the parties. It includes a process for ajudicating disputes. There is nothing Bud Selig can do. Its not up to him to 'stand for' anything. And news flash for Dave: There is no "good of the game" clause giving a commissioner power to dictate results. But Selig does have the influence to manipulate the outcome. Edited March 2, 2012 by GoodSpeak Quote
Dan Gould Posted March 2, 2012 Report Posted March 2, 2012 In the World According to Dave James, Bud Selig is the epitome of evil. In the real world, there is a CBA, and a drug testing regime negotiated and agreed to by the parties. It includes a process for ajudicating disputes. There is nothing Bud Selig can do. Its not up to him to 'stand for' anything. And news flash for Dave: There is no "good of the game" clause giving a commissioner power to dictate results. But Selig does have the influence to manipulate the outcome. Wow, so Bud manipulated the arbitrator into a decision that embarrasses MLB and Bud Selig. by george I think you've solved the case! Quote
Dave James Posted March 2, 2012 Report Posted March 2, 2012 In the World According to Dave James, Bud Selig is the epitome of evil. In the real world, there is a CBA, and a drug testing regime negotiated and agreed to by the parties. It includes a process for ajudicating disputes. There is nothing Bud Selig can do. Its not up to him to 'stand for' anything. And news flash for Dave: There is no "good of the game" clause giving a commissioner power to dictate results. Oh yeah? How about when Bowie Kuhn overturned Charlie FInley's trade of VIda Blue, Joe Rudi and Rollie FIngers? As I recall he cited the fact that such a trade was not in the best interests of the game. Is having your reigning MVP get away with taking steroids in the best interests of the game? In Dave James' world, that's a no. In Dan Gould's world, perhaps that's a yes. Also, just to clarify, I never said Selig was the epitome of evil. I just said he was a tool, a remark by which I will gladly stand. Quote
Dan Gould Posted March 3, 2012 Report Posted March 3, 2012 Quincy or one of the other knowledgeable participants will back me up. When Fay Vincent was replaced, the "best interests of the game" clause was removed from the powers of the office of Commissioner. Quote
Dave James Posted March 3, 2012 Report Posted March 3, 2012 More recently, I believe Bud Selig used the authority vested in him to separate Frank McCount from the ownership of the Los Angeles Dodgers. That was also done in the best interests of baseball. Quote
Brad Posted March 3, 2012 Report Posted March 3, 2012 The McCourt matter needs to be distinguished from a player matter because the latter is subject to the CBA so different rules apply. Quote
JETman Posted March 3, 2012 Report Posted March 3, 2012 None of this matters. In the court of public opinion, Ryan Braun will be a BIG loser. Quote
paul secor Posted March 3, 2012 Report Posted March 3, 2012 None of this matters. In the court of public opinion, Ryan Braun will be a BIG loser. Except with Brewers fans. Quote
JETman Posted March 3, 2012 Report Posted March 3, 2012 I think we've all won in that regard at one time or another. What did it get US? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.