Soulstation1 Posted December 31, 2003 Report Posted December 31, 2003 michigan vs usc this is the best bowl game match-up imo. the blue 31-17 ss1 Quote
chris olivarez Posted December 31, 2003 Report Posted December 31, 2003 One of the very few times ever I'll be rooting for the University of Spoiled Children. Quote
GregK Posted December 31, 2003 Report Posted December 31, 2003 the national champ should be the winner of this game, screw the BCS Quote
minew Posted January 1, 2004 Report Posted January 1, 2004 the national champ should be the winner of this game, screw the BCS If the boys in blue wanted to play for a national championship, they should have eaten their Wheaties on their trips to Eugene and Iowa City. I will be rooting for them, though, to pave the way for LSU's first championship in 45 years. Quote
GregK Posted January 1, 2004 Report Posted January 1, 2004 the national champ should be the winner of this game, screw the BCS If the boys in blue wanted to play for a national championship, they should have eaten their Wheaties on their trips to Eugene and Iowa City. I will be rooting for them, though, to pave the way for LSU's first championship in 45 years. at least OSU are below Michigan!! Quote
connoisseur series500 Posted January 1, 2004 Report Posted January 1, 2004 I'm not a big college football fan, though I love the NFL. I will, however, watch the Rose Bowl. Rootin' for Michigan of course. Quote
scottb Posted January 1, 2004 Report Posted January 1, 2004 I'm pulling for the Blue as well. Then we won't have to hear USC whine about how they were robbed. The computer put OU and LSU in the Sugar Bowl because that's what we told it to do. They are the two best teams, mathematically. It is a little hard to swallow that a team who didn't even win their conference can play for the national championship, but still just one loss and a tougher schedule. Honestly, I was hoping for an LSU v USC matchup so my Tigers could whip 'em and expose how overrated they are. I think Michigan has a great chance against them today. GEAUX TIGERS!!! Quote
GA Russell Posted January 1, 2004 Report Posted January 1, 2004 I think scottb got it exactly right. I would change the system by simply adding a rule that requires a team to win its conference championship in order to play in a BCS bowl game. That would open the games up to other conferences, and would eliminate the national champ controversies we've had recently. Quote
Brandon Burke Posted January 1, 2004 Report Posted January 1, 2004 (edited) I'm not a particularly big football fan (college or pro). This likely stems from the fact that (1) my alma mater, the University of Kansas, is a basketball school and (2) I worked at Arrowhead Stadium for about four years. It was the beginning of the Carl Petterson era and that guy is just an assh*le. Straight up. To this day, it still baffles me how Chiefs fans can hate the Raiders so much when their own GM is nothing more than a younger Al Davis. Anyways......I seldom miss the Rose Bowl, regardless of whether ot not it determines the championship. It's just one of those special events in sport. Edited January 2, 2004 by Brandon Burke Quote
Jazzmoose Posted January 1, 2004 Report Posted January 1, 2004 Oops! Thought this was about the parade; never mind... Quote
scottb Posted January 2, 2004 Report Posted January 2, 2004 Oh well, so much for the undisputed national championship. I gotta admit, USC looked very impressive against a very good Michigan team. Hard to say whose better without a playoff system. I guess we'll never know. Quote
Soulstation1 Posted January 2, 2004 Author Report Posted January 2, 2004 usc's speed and quickness was too much for my boys. mike williams is the real deal and their defense has a few pros also. ss1 Quote
_forumlogo.png.a607ef20a6e0c299ab2aa6443aa1f32e.png)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.