GA Russell Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 (edited) I don't see a thread about this year's college football, so I thought I would start one about the bowl games. The LA Times links don't carry over to here for some reason, but you can find a real good preview of all of the bowl games by entering "College Bowl Matchups" into the search box, and scroll down to the article with that title, attributed to "Tribune Newspapers". http://www.latimes.com/ Edited December 6, 2010 by GA Russell Quote
alocispepraluger102 Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 I don't see a thread about this year's college football, so I thought I would start one about the bowl games. The LA Times links don't carry over to here for some reason, but you can find a real good preview of all of the bowl games by entering "College Bowl Matchups" into the search box, and scroll down to the article with that title, attributed to "Tribune Newspapers". http://www.latimes.com/ thanks-i need to catch up on the match ups. Quote
papsrus Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 Too many bowls. Too drawn out. If the NCAA isn't going to institute a playoff system, I wish they'd go back to playing all the big bowl games on New Year's Day for one final holiday football feast, and then be done with it. (Sorry to pee in the punch bowl right off the bat.) Quote
Dave James Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 While I didn't go to the UO (Lewis & Clark is my alma mater) I'm a life long Oregon resident. The idea of the Ducks playing for a national championship, even if it's part of the incredibly flawed BCS, is as good as it can possibly get. I was lucky enough to see the Ducks play this year in Eugene against UCLA, a game they won 60-13. I'll tell you, when they are hitting on all cylinders, it is something to behold. I'm thinking that the odds guys in Vegas might even peg the over/under at 100 points considering the potency of the Oregon and Auburn offenses. This place is going to be nuts between now and January 10th. Quote
GA Russell Posted December 6, 2010 Author Report Posted December 6, 2010 If the NCAA isn't going to institute a playoff system, I wish they'd go back to playing all the big bowl games on New Year's Day for one final holiday football feast, and then be done with it. (Sorry to pee in the punch bowl right off the bat.) Paps, I agree 100%. Not peeing in the punch bowl at all. However, I disagree that there are too many bowl games. Nowadays the schedules are loaded with non-conference pushovers, and the bowl games offer contests between two decent (and presumably evenly matched) teams. I would just move everything up a few days on the calendar. It's all anti-climactic after Jan. 1, so let's do it all then. Quote
Lazaro Vega Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 Michigan State vs. Alabama. Looking forward to it. Quote
Jazzmoose Posted December 8, 2010 Report Posted December 8, 2010 As someone who grew up in Georgia and has always felt the SEC was a cut above the rest of the country, this feels funny, but...GO DUCKS!!! By the way, does anyone else already feel really, really bad for UConn? Too many bowls. Too drawn out. If the NCAA isn't going to institute a playoff system, I wish they'd go back to playing all the big bowl games on New Year's Day for one final holiday football feast, and then be done with it. (Sorry to pee in the punch bowl right off the bat.) No worries; it needed to be peed in... Quote
Dan Gould Posted December 8, 2010 Report Posted December 8, 2010 A little excited at the prospect of FSU making Steve Spurrier throw his clipboard again. And a little worried that FSU will lose. Quote
Free For All Posted December 8, 2010 Report Posted December 8, 2010 A little excited at the prospect of FSU making Steve Spurrier throw his clipboard again. And a little worried that FSU will lose. Agreed. Quote
AmirBagachelles Posted December 8, 2010 Report Posted December 8, 2010 These university teams should go back to playing a ten or twelve game schedule, and the best twenty or so should get to play in bowls from Dec 26-Jan 1, and then back to class. We don't need a playoff, we need more schoolin'. Hats off to heroic efforts by true student-athletes over the course of the real/regular season. I attended a small Division I school, and many of the football players were amazing, driven student athletes. At a program level, I know there are exceptions, but what we see today in the bowls is not really college football. Quote
papsrus Posted December 8, 2010 Report Posted December 8, 2010 These university teams should go back to playing a ten or twelve game schedule, and the best twenty or so should get to play in bowls from Dec 26-Jan 1, and then back to class. ... what we see today in the bowls is not really college football. I think many college teams do play a 12-game schedule now. A shorter bowl season ending emphatically on Jan. 1 would be nice. Quote
Free For All Posted December 8, 2010 Report Posted December 8, 2010 These university teams should go back to playing a ten or twelve game schedule, and the best twenty or so should get to play in bowls from Dec 26-Jan 1, and then back to class. ... what we see today in the bowls is not really college football. I think many college teams do play a 12-game schedule now. A shorter bowl season ending emphatically on Jan. 1 would be nice. One of my big complaints about the length of the current bowl season is the amount of downtime that precedes the championship game. Too much time for rust to set in as well as all the media distractions. Quote
Man with the Golden Arm Posted December 23, 2010 Report Posted December 23, 2010 NCAA stiffs Buckeyes! ESPN: COLUMBUS, Ohio -- Five Ohio State football players, including quarterback Terrelle Pryor, must sit out the first five games of the 2011 season for accepting improper benefits, the NCAA ruled Thursday. All of the players be eligible for the Jan. 4 Allstate Sugar Bowl, however. Five players were found to have sold awards, gifts and university apparel, plus receive improper benefits in 2009. In addition to missing five games next season, Pryor, Mike Adams, Daniel Herron, Devier Posey and Solomon Thomas must repay money and benefits ranging in value from $1,000 to $2,500. The repayments must be made to a charity wtf is with these players!? something in them "buckeye leaf" stickers numbing their brains? or just the lineage of Hayes, Schlichter, Clarett, Tatum ... Quote
Quincy Posted December 23, 2010 Report Posted December 23, 2010 It disgusts me that a football program brings in over $65,000,000 and all the best players get out of the deal is a scholarship. So you sell a tacky ring for $2500 and now you have to pay it back? Bah. Quote
GA Russell Posted December 23, 2010 Author Report Posted December 23, 2010 I'm surprised there haven't been college betting scandals like there were in the 50s. One of the justifications of paying pro players so much is that they won't be tempted by the gamblers to throw the game. Quote
GA Russell Posted January 1, 2011 Author Report Posted January 1, 2011 Here's an interesting article on the budgets of the various bowl teams. http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/bowls10/news/story?id=5970794 Quote
GA Russell Posted January 1, 2011 Author Report Posted January 1, 2011 (edited) I am shocked to learn today that the Rose Bowl game is on pay tv (ESPN, a cable channel). Edited January 1, 2011 by GA Russell Quote
papsrus Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 Where are we at here? Big Ten tanks on New Year's Day, with the SEC going 3-0 against them. I didn't think TCU had a shot against Wisconsin. Hm. ... Wisconsin DBs lined up 10 yards off of the TCU wideouts all day long, and TCU took advantage of it. Curious strategy. I would have thought the Badgers would make an adjustment there at halftime. Nope. Most intense game I've seen so far was the FSU-South Carolina tilt New Year's Eve. Both teams were absolutely flying at each other -- a car wreck on just about every play. Weis to Florida as offensive coordinator. What's next? Belichick as defensive coordinator? State of Fla. had six bowl teams this year and they came out of it 5-1. Quote
ejp626 Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 Where are we at here? Big Ten tanks on New Year's Day, with the SEC going 3-0 against them. Ironically, Northwestern put up the best fight, but still came up short. Well, maybe next year. Quote
papsrus Posted January 4, 2011 Report Posted January 4, 2011 Stanford looked unbeatable last night. Polished, efficient. I can see why their QB Andrew Luck is projected as the top pick in the draft, if he leaves college. Stanford's only loss was to Oregon. Auburn is going to have their hands full against the Ducks. Quote
Jim R Posted January 4, 2011 Report Posted January 4, 2011 Stanford looked unbeatable last night. Polished, efficient. I can see why their QB Andrew Luck is projected as the top pick in the draft, if he leaves college. Stanford's only loss was to Oregon. Auburn is going to have their hands full against the Ducks. I've got to hand it to Harbaugh. Stanford definitely has decent talent, but it looked to me like VT was dramatically outcoached. On those long runs from scrimmage, and especially on those TD passes, the VT defense was repeatedly way out of position. Luck was being praised by the announcers for being so deadly accurate (and he was pretty sharp), but on several of his big pass plays, all he had to do was lob a safe ball out there to a WIDE open guy. That was all about coaching, play-calling, making adjustments. Oregon's offense is definitely outstanding, and Chip Kelly has been masterful this year (especially in the 3rd and 4th quarters, when they've really run up the score). On the other hand, I've only seen Auburn once (vs South Carolina), and Newton looked like Superman. Absolutely unstoppable. I don't envy either defense, but whichever one steps up and prevents big plays, that will decide the game. Should be fun. Quote
paul secor Posted January 5, 2011 Report Posted January 5, 2011 Stanford looked unbeatable last night. Polished, efficient. I can see why their QB Andrew Luck is projected as the top pick in the draft, if he leaves college. Stanford's only loss was to Oregon. Auburn is going to have their hands full against the Ducks. I've got to hand it to Harbaugh. Stanford definitely has decent talent, but it looked to me like VT was dramatically outcoached. On those long runs from scrimmage, and especially on those TD passes, the VT defense was repeatedly way out of position. Luck was being praised by the announcers for being so deadly accurate (and he was pretty sharp), but on several of his big pass plays, all he had to do was lob a safe ball out there to a WIDE open guy. That was all about coaching, play-calling, making adjustments. On ESPN 2 this morning, Trent Dilfer made the comment that Harbaugh is playing chess while other coaches are playing checkers. Don't know that that's true, but it was a good line. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.