Chalupa Posted March 20, 2009 Report Posted March 20, 2009 FYI..... I saw this in one of the local brick & mortar stores today. Alas, no cash on me at the time. Originally released on Sackville now on AECO/Katalyst. Quote
medjuck Posted March 20, 2009 Report Posted March 20, 2009 Hey I think I was at that concert. Is there other Sackville material on this label? Quote
B. Clugston Posted March 20, 2009 Report Posted March 20, 2009 I have this on vinyl. Never really cared for it, other than the second version of Nonaah. Quote
Lazaro Vega Posted March 21, 2009 Report Posted March 21, 2009 I believe that's a photo of Roscoe in Bath, Michigan, outside of East Lansing. Quote
Chuck Nessa Posted March 21, 2009 Report Posted March 21, 2009 Yup. No other Sackvilles on the label. Sackville decided they could not reissue it for technical reasons and returned the tapes to Roscoe. Have no idea about the processing of the recordings but a bunch of tape print was on the masters. It can be corrected but takes a lot of time and patience. Quote
Chalupa Posted April 20, 2009 Author Report Posted April 20, 2009 Yup. No other Sackvilles on the label. Sackville decided they could not reissue it for technical reasons and returned the tapes to Roscoe. Have no idea about the processing of the recordings but a bunch of tape print was on the masters. It can be corrected but takes a lot of time and patience. So what's the verdict? Did they get rid of the tape print? Quote
clifford_thornton Posted April 20, 2009 Report Posted April 20, 2009 I like this set! Got the LP well before it was out in digital form. I hope they cleared up the print-through because that could be a little wonky in the listening department. But regardless, recommended. Quote
Chalupa Posted April 20, 2009 Author Report Posted April 20, 2009 Oh I have the LP and I like it too. I was just wondering if Chuck has listened to the new CD yet and whether it still exhibited the tape print. If it does I'll probably just stick w/ the vinyl. Quote
.:.impossible Posted April 2, 2012 Report Posted April 2, 2012 Home today with my 3 month old son, so we're digging through some records that Mommy doesn't particularly dig. I just listened to this for the first time today. I picked it up In Knoxville about a month ago, along with a sealed Open Air Suite! Sounded good to me. I didn't notice any print-through. I'll listen again with this in mind and let y'all know. I was particularly taken by "Ttum" on the second side. I had to listen twice. And then again. I can imagine how scorching his tone could sound with bass and drums on this composition. Now listening to Open Air Suite for the first time! Quote
JSngry Posted April 3, 2012 Report Posted April 3, 2012 Now listening to Open Air Suite for the first time! Watch out for The Jick. He'll getcha' every time! Quote
David Ayers Posted April 3, 2012 Report Posted April 3, 2012 The Roscoe's kind of classic, isn't it? Quote
.:.impossible Posted April 3, 2012 Report Posted April 3, 2012 Oh yeah. Both of these records are fantastic. Quote
.:.impossible Posted July 18, 2012 Report Posted July 18, 2012 I did notice the print-through this morning. Especially at the beginning of Eeltwo on Side 2.I wouldn't let this deter you from hearing the music though. Quote
.:.impossible Posted July 18, 2012 Report Posted July 18, 2012 Yeah, ok, so maybe I just didn't have it turned up enough before. Or it could be the new interconnects? Quote
romualdo Posted July 19, 2012 Report Posted July 19, 2012 Yup. No other Sackvilles on the label. Sackville decided they could not reissue it for technical reasons and returned the tapes to Roscoe. Have no idea about the processing of the recordings but a bunch of tape print was on the masters. It can be corrected but takes a lot of time and patience. Please excuse the ignorance but would some kind person explain what "tape print" is & how does this "contamination" occur I bought this CD when it was first reissued - may have to listen to it again Quote
king ubu Posted July 19, 2012 Report Posted July 19, 2012 I guess it's when you hear a very distant echo of the music that will actually follow half a second or so later (so it's a pre-echo). Quote
Chuck Nessa Posted July 19, 2012 Report Posted July 19, 2012 Ubu is correct. It can also be post-echo. Quote
mjzee Posted July 19, 2012 Report Posted July 19, 2012 IIRC, print-through is when music has been stored on the reel of the reel-to-reel tape for a long time; under certain conditions, the magnetic layers of tape "print-through" to the next layer - the magnetic filaments can move some of the filaments on the adjacent layer to have the same pattern, creating the same sounds. Because only some of the filaments move, this creates a ghostly affect that you can hear underneath the original sound that's on the tape. Quote
Chuck Nessa Posted July 19, 2012 Report Posted July 19, 2012 True, but sometimes it happens almost instantly as the tape rolls. It is most obvious on recordings by solo wind instruments. Quote
JSngry Posted July 19, 2012 Report Posted July 19, 2012 Were any brands of tape more susceptible to this than others? Quote
Chuck Nessa Posted July 19, 2012 Report Posted July 19, 2012 (edited) Back in the day all the tape companies were pitching the "hottest" new tape to the studios. Seriously, I could go in the studio a week after a session and hear Ampex or 3M had new formulations I should try. This was great for Grand Funk but lousy for Roscoe and Braxton. Edited July 19, 2012 by Chuck Nessa Quote
Don Brown Posted July 20, 2012 Report Posted July 20, 2012 Can't help wondering whether or not impossible's three-year old son enjoyed Roscoe's music. In all likelihood he did. I love the way youngsters can be so open to sounds they've not heard before. Quote
WD45 Posted July 20, 2012 Report Posted July 20, 2012 I remember print-through being an issue on the CD reissue of Jimmy Giuffre's "Free Fall" album on Columbia. That's where I first learned of the phenomenon. Quote
colinmce Posted July 20, 2012 Report Posted July 20, 2012 Yep. Steve Lacy at Unity Temple has it bad, too. Quote
.:.impossible Posted July 22, 2012 Report Posted July 22, 2012 Don, he was three months so it's hard to know for certain. My daughter is almost three. She asks for Charlie Parker and Bud Powell on occasion, which is an absolute thrill! When she was slightly younger, I remember her dancing ecstatically to Albert Ayler! I just haven't listened to Ayler in a bit. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.