Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yup.

No other Sackvilles on the label. Sackville decided they could not reissue it for technical reasons and returned the tapes to Roscoe. Have no idea about the processing of the recordings but a bunch of tape print was on the masters. It can be corrected but takes a lot of time and patience.

  • 5 weeks later...
Posted

Yup.

No other Sackvilles on the label. Sackville decided they could not reissue it for technical reasons and returned the tapes to Roscoe. Have no idea about the processing of the recordings but a bunch of tape print was on the masters. It can be corrected but takes a lot of time and patience.

So what's the verdict? Did they get rid of the tape print?

Posted

Oh I have the LP and I like it too. I was just wondering if Chuck has listened to the new CD yet and whether it still exhibited the tape print. If it does I'll probably just stick w/ the vinyl.

  • 2 years later...
Posted

Home today with my 3 month old son, so we're digging through some records that Mommy doesn't particularly dig.

I just listened to this for the first time today. I picked it up In Knoxville about a month ago, along with a sealed Open Air Suite!

Sounded good to me. I didn't notice any print-through. I'll listen again with this in mind and let y'all know. I

was particularly taken by "Ttum" on the second side. I had to listen twice. And then again. I can imagine how scorching his tone could sound with bass and drums on this composition.

Now listening to Open Air Suite for the first time!

  • 3 months later...
Posted

Yup.

No other Sackvilles on the label. Sackville decided they could not reissue it for technical reasons and returned the tapes to Roscoe. Have no idea about the processing of the recordings but a bunch of tape print was on the masters. It can be corrected but takes a lot of time and patience.

Please excuse the ignorance but would some kind person explain what "tape print" is & how does this "contamination" occur

I bought this CD when it was first reissued - may have to listen to it again

Posted

IIRC, print-through is when music has been stored on the reel of the reel-to-reel tape for a long time; under certain conditions, the magnetic layers of tape "print-through" to the next layer - the magnetic filaments can move some of the filaments on the adjacent layer to have the same pattern, creating the same sounds. Because only some of the filaments move, this creates a ghostly affect that you can hear underneath the original sound that's on the tape.

Posted (edited)

Back in the day all the tape companies were pitching the "hottest" new tape to the studios. Seriously, I could go in the studio a week after a session and hear Ampex or 3M had new formulations I should try. This was great for Grand Funk but lousy for Roscoe and Braxton.

Edited by Chuck Nessa
Posted

Can't help wondering whether or not impossible's three-year old son enjoyed Roscoe's music. In all likelihood he did. I love the way youngsters can be so open to sounds they've not heard before.

Posted

Don, he was three months so it's hard to know for certain.

My daughter is almost three. She asks for Charlie Parker and Bud Powell on occasion, which is an absolute thrill!

When she was slightly younger, I remember her dancing ecstatically to Albert Ayler! I just haven't listened to Ayler in a bit.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...