Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Oh yeah this is photoshop, I never liked Aniston i don't think she's that special

looks like your average girl from high school .

She is big time below AVERAGE...if she was an actress (and i use that term loosely with her) in the 30's,40's,50's

she wouldn't be a blip on the screen....maybe an extra.

Posted

Oh yeah this is photoshop, I never liked Aniston i don't think she's that special

looks like your average girl from high school .

Well...yeah!

She is big time below blah blah...if she was an blah blah (and i use that term loosely with her) in the 30's,40's,50's

she wouldn't be a blah blah blah blah.

:w

Posted

... But I don't trust any photos in magazines.

For sure. And it's nothing new. Air-brushing was rampant for decades prior to the Photoshop era.

I've always wondered about this one. Not the Nancy Wilson part, but when did Cannonball ever look that slender?

617.jpg

Posted

Oh yeah this is photoshop, I never liked Aniston i don't think she's that special

looks like your average girl from high school .

She is big time below AVERAGE...if she was an actress (and i use that term loosely with her) in the 30's,40's,50's

she wouldn't be a blip on the screen....maybe an extra.

:D

Average girl from high school? I wanna live in your world! :D

OK, back to reading my Home Depot household fix-its manual.

Posted

Ok, sh'es purty, and I'd "do" her" till the cows came home (& I'd hire somebody to kep them distracted and/or lost), but homegirl does have a chin that is a dealbreaker as far as possibly procreating goes.

Posted

OK, you fellas are starting to obsess over this photoshop thing. And now we got a chin that disqualifies her from procreation, and a bikini air brushed out of the way? What next, phony dimples painted on? ... you're killing me. Killing me, I tell ya!

I'm moving on. Y'all can have her. :beee:

Posted

Just for the record, when I said "do her", I meant "do her". Not DO her. Ironic winkwink re:stunted adolescent sexual maturity fully intended, and apologies if intent was not clearly communicated.

I mean, really, I'd not do her. I love my wife and have had a great lifetime doing her, and look forward to a great remaining lifetime of more of the same.

And yes, irony intended here as well...

Posted

No one is obligated to "DO" her, ironically or otherwise, but to call her "below average" reminds me of a scene in When Harry Met Sally -

Empirically, you are attractive.

Anyone who can't figure out that empirically, Ms. Aniston is attractive needs to have their eyesight checked.

Posted

Just for the record, when I said "do her", I meant "do her". Not DO her. Ironic winkwink re:stunted adolescent sexual maturity fully intended, and apologies if intent was not clearly communicated.

I mean, really, I'd not do her. I love my wife and have had a great lifetime doing her, and look forward to a great remaining lifetime of more of the same.

And yes, irony intended here as well...

A likely story.

Posted

What's funny is I have always thought she was attractive, but is about as unphotogenic as you can get, which is strange for an actress. Moving pictures, fine, magazine covers??? Just about every one I have ever seen of her look like one's that should have been rejected.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...