Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

You know the phenomenon: you're shopping for CDs or LPs (...or 78s or cassettes..). You pick up something based on the title or artist. A quick glimpse and back she goes. What will cause you to put something back - aside from money or the discovery that you already have most or all of the music? Too many standards? Too few? A player, song or instrument you don't like? A label you don't like (e.g., Andorran)? 27 minute recording time? Suspect mastering? Cover art?

For me, it's vocals, Andorrans and, for easily located music, cutouts.

Edited by BeBop
Posted

In no particular order...

> Vocals in a lead role, or any whiff of a hint that the vocals are of the "traditional" jazz variety.

> Lack of sidemen listed anywhere on the outside.

> CD Playing time less than 37 minutes (in most cases, but not all).

> Leader plays too many different wind instruments on the same session (four or more = "no way" - and I'm skeptical with even three).

> Two or more boring (overplayed) standards.

> The presence of anybody on the recording that I associate with the 'Wyntonian' circle of musicians.

and just for Chuck...

> Anything NOT certifiably recorded between November 8, 1963 (a.k.a. "Black Fire") and sometime around the 3rd quarter of 1978. :g

Posted (edited)

Lack of sideman listings is an almost surefire no-go here too. Possibly because of another strong aversion: James Spaulding

Another: any CD for which the mainstream hype-machine is spinning wildly out of control. (e.g., Esperanza Spalding)

Edited by BeBop
Posted (edited)

Lack of sideman listings is an almost surefire no-go here too. Possibly because of another strong aversion: James Spaulding

Ooo, I've done that. Not sure if it's him or my sometime fear of flute. It's a part-time affliction cause you know, I love Dolphy on flute, and others too such as Kirk and Rivers.

Length of disc doesn't matter that much if the price reflects the poundage. I've actually come to appreciate the 35 minute CD that has little to no filler over discs crammed to limit with bonus tracks that may have been better left in the vault.

Edited by Quincy
Posted

There are certain sideman that stop me cold in my tracks. The rest of the band and the songs may seem interesting but if I see certain names, I drop it like a hot potato.

Javon Jackson is a case in point. He may be a wonderful person, but he's not my kind of player.

Posted

Lack of sideman listings is an almost surefire no-go here too. Possibly because of another strong aversion: James Spaulding

Another: any CD for which the mainstream hype-machine is spinning wildly out of control. (e.g., Esperanza Spalding)

So...you're saying that the new "Spaulding Meets Spalding" disc is a no go for you? <_<

Posted

Lack of sideman listings is an almost surefire no-go here too. Possibly because of another strong aversion: James Spaulding

Another: any CD for which the mainstream hype-machine is spinning wildly out of control. (e.g., Esperanza Spalding)

So...you're saying that the new "Spaulding Meets Spalding" disc is a no go for you? <_<

Not unless it's a DVD featuring medieval weapons.

I'm kidding. I do have a heap of LPs/CDs with James Spaulding. (22, if my database can be trusted, including many enjoyable ones with Freddie Hubbard, Wayne Shorter and Duke Pearson) I just tend to put him deeply in the liability column when I calculate the worth of a recording, to me.

Posted

I haven't gone CD shopping in a long time but before I stopped buying, I was starting to put things back on the basis of "is this going to be significantly better or different from what I already have by X?"

Posted

besides individual players, i tend to look a lot at instrumentation, too; for instance, knowing that i listen to about five hours of piano trio a year i rather buy quartets and quintets... (same with big bands...)

Posted (edited)

What will cause you to put something back - aside from money or the discovery that you already have most or all of the music?

Security cameras.

:rofl:

I guess for me it would strictly be about the $$$... going to Amoeba and being accustomed to used prices has spoiled me whenever I see a place trying to charge $17.99 for a CD.

Cheers,

Shane

Edited by Indestructible!
Posted

I can't remember the last time I had to put a disk back, my buying is usually pretty focused.

.

Yeah, me too. On vinyl, condition is the main issue for me. If it's not quasi mint, or a strong VG++ at least, I don't fool with it. Keeps my collection manageable, too.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...