connoisseur series500 Posted March 16, 2008 Report Posted March 16, 2008 Woody nailed them and was close on the one he missed. Thanks for posting this! Quote
AndrewHill Posted March 16, 2008 Report Posted March 16, 2008 Yeah, keep'em coming, this is cool stuff! I agree, Woody nailed it except for the Art Farmer, which I further agree could be easily missed because Art did some records that do have a 'plusher sound'. An example, maybe, is Listen to Art Farmer and the Orchestra on Mercury (VEE) where the arrangements make Farmer sound much cooler. Even on Mulligan's Night Lights too perhaps. Quote
Noj Posted March 16, 2008 Report Posted March 16, 2008 What unbelievably sharp ears Woody had. He identified practically every musician! Thanks for posting all these DB articles, JSngry. Quote
CJ Shearn Posted March 16, 2008 Report Posted March 16, 2008 yeah, Woody was amazing. The way he nailed that was amazing for the most part Quote
connoisseur series500 Posted March 16, 2008 Report Posted March 16, 2008 hah! a record player... also, Chet Baker >>>> Art Farmer, tho' i can understand why Woody wouldn't think so... & Art is often terrific but very rarely AS terrific as Chet's best. that is THE FACT signed, edc also-- NOJ, identifying each musician isn't that hard or impressive THEN bc 1) there were less musicians 2) each record had much greater value i could tell you the full bands of nearly every jazz album i owned prior to 1991 or so, it's just how we did shit then, & even in the interregnum between vinyl & the all-everything all-the-time digital ubiquity of today. why? real listenas do real things. Still, it shows that Woody was quite academic in his approach to his peers and predecessors. Compare his response to Grant Green's! Quite a difference, which I think is reflected in their different approaches to their own music. But I'm also hearing what you're saying. Quote
Larry Kart Posted March 16, 2008 Report Posted March 16, 2008 hah! a record player... also, Chet Baker >>>> Art Farmer, tho' i can understand why Woody wouldn't think so... & Art is often terrific but very rarely AS terrific as Chet's best. that is THE FACT signed, edc also-- NOJ, identifying each musician isn't that hard or impressive THEN bc 1) there were less musicians 2) each record had much greater value i could tell you the full bands of nearly every jazz album i owned prior to 1991 or so, it's just how we did shit then, & even in the interregnum between vinyl & the all-everything all-the-time digital ubiquity of today. why? real listenas do real things. About 1) it's not that there were fewer musicians then as that so many of them were so distinctive. I mean, off the top of my head, who could mistake Bill Hardman for anyone else? While, again off the top of my head, I like and respect the work of Alex Sipiagin, Scott Wendholt, Jeremy Pelt, Greg Gisbert, etc. but am not sure I could tell one from the other automatically. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.