alocispepraluger102 Posted October 27, 2007 Report Posted October 27, 2007 http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/27/business...&ei=5087%0A Quote
Jazzmoose Posted October 27, 2007 Report Posted October 27, 2007 Hard to believe the DC-9 is still around. Quote
AndrewHill Posted October 28, 2007 Report Posted October 28, 2007 And I've flown on planes, even this year, where they still have the ashtrays built into the arms of the chairs, when smoking was permitted in the cabin. I believe smoking was banned on airplanes in 1990. Now that's at least an 18 year old plane. Quote
Aggie87 Posted October 28, 2007 Report Posted October 28, 2007 And I've flown on planes, even this year, where they still have the ashtrays built into the arms of the chairs, when smoking was permitted in the cabin. I believe smoking was banned on airplanes in 1990. Now that's at least an 18 year old plane. Aircraft have quite different lifespans from automobiles, so an 18 year old plane shouldn't be cause for concern, in general. Airlines (at least in this country) are very serious about maintaining them on a regular basis after so many flight hours. They also go through regular meticulous inspections from nose to tail. The military still has Vietnam era helicopters in the fleet, and there are B-52s in the Air Force that have been in service since 1955. Quote
AndrewHill Posted October 28, 2007 Report Posted October 28, 2007 And I've flown on planes, even this year, where they still have the ashtrays built into the arms of the chairs, when smoking was permitted in the cabin. I believe smoking was banned on airplanes in 1990. Now that's at least an 18 year old plane. Aircraft have quite different lifespans from automobiles, so an 18 year old plane shouldn't be cause for concern, in general. Airlines (at least in this country) are very serious about maintaining them on a regular basis after so many flight hours. They also go through regular meticulous inspections from nose to tail. The military still has Vietnam era helicopters in the fleet, and there are B-52s in the Air Force that have been in service since 1955. Luckily, I've never been on a flight that has had a problem. -_- Quote
clifford_thornton Posted October 28, 2007 Report Posted October 28, 2007 Most of my problems have been on Northwest's DC-9s. Quote
MoGrubb Posted October 28, 2007 Report Posted October 28, 2007 (edited) .... Aircraft have quite different lifespans from automobiles, so an 18 year old plane shouldn't be cause for concern, in general. Airlines (at least in this country) are very serious about maintaining them on a regular basis after so many flight hours. They also go through regular meticulous inspections from nose to tail. The military still has Vietnam era helicopters in the fleet, and there are B-52s in the Air Force that have been in service since 1955. True, you see some real oldies, B-49, at some of these air shows; and damned if I want to go up in an old biplane, e.g. Anyhow, not to hijack the thread, but when defense money talk comes around somebody usually points out how "old" the B-52s are, e.g., never mind that they are adequate for doing the job, their life expectancy greatly exceeds autos; got to have latest, it means jobs and votes...MONEY. Edited October 28, 2007 by MoGrubb Quote
Herb Posted October 30, 2007 Report Posted October 30, 2007 I really enjoy flying in this 49 year old airliner: Quote
alocispepraluger102 Posted October 30, 2007 Author Report Posted October 30, 2007 .... Aircraft have quite different lifespans from automobiles, so an 18 year old plane shouldn't be cause for concern, in general. Airlines (at least in this country) are very serious about maintaining them on a regular basis after so many flight hours. They also go through regular meticulous inspections from nose to tail. The military still has Vietnam era helicopters in the fleet, and there are B-52s in the Air Force that have been in service since 1955. True, you see some real oldies, B-49, at some of these air shows; and damned if I want to go up in an old biplane, e.g. Anyhow, not to hijack the thread, but when defense money talk comes around somebody usually points out how "old" the B-52s are, e.g., never mind that they are adequate for doing the job, their life expectancy greatly exceeds autos; got to have latest, it means jobs and votes...MONEY. with the current and expected costs of energy, less efficient equipment would appear to be a great problem. Quote
MoGrubb Posted October 30, 2007 Report Posted October 30, 2007 (edited) I have not seen, nor looked for, I confess, an energy comparison chart. I guess the difference perhaps may be 1 mpg to 1 1/2 mpg? Edited October 30, 2007 by MoGrubb Quote
Daniel A Posted October 30, 2007 Report Posted October 30, 2007 And I've flown on planes, even this year, where they still have the ashtrays built into the arms of the chairs, when smoking was permitted in the cabin. http://smintair.com/ Quote
AndrewHill Posted October 30, 2007 Report Posted October 30, 2007 And I've flown on planes, even this year, where they still have the ashtrays built into the arms of the chairs, when smoking was permitted in the cabin. http://smintair.com/ I can assure you that I wasn't on that plane! Quote
Daniel A Posted October 30, 2007 Report Posted October 30, 2007 I can assure you that I wasn't on that plane! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.