Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I wish they would add the discographical info for the old sets.

I have no idea why they remove it once a set goes OOP.

Stupid.

Absolutely. Would not take that much space and would be very helpful to a lot of fans of the label!

Posted (edited)

I wish they would add the discographical info for the old sets.

I have no idea why they remove it once a set goes OOP.

Stupid.

Absolutely. Would not take that much space and would be very helpful to a lot of fans of the label!

Why not ask Mosaic?

Edited by J.A.W.
Posted

I prefer the old look. But maybe I was just used to it.

Old one had a Blue Note vibe to its design. The new one is just fugly.

Yeah! That's it---that Blue Note vibe! Gotta love it.

I take it "fugly" is short for "fuckin' ugly"? I'd have called it bland and standardized, but fugly, well...yes.

Posted

Why not ask Mosaic?

This was done earlier today. Will report any reply ;)

:tup

The Mosaic reply came in today:

Good suggestion and we will look into it. Thanks for the comments. They

are

much appreciated.

Posted

I'm not sure how much I like the new design... I think the old one might have been better. But the site looks easy to handle now, that's for sure.

I also asked them about posting the old/OOP sets' discographies, it would be great to have them all accessible!

Posted (edited)

By the way there is currently a sale. All selects for the next week are available for 39 bucks, singles at 13 $.

..And 10 - 15% off the prices of the big sets. See also this thread. The sale ends October 14.

Edited by J.A.W.
Posted

Yep, two earlier versions. I checked with Internet Archive's Wayback Machine, and the first one seems to have been active in 1999-2003:

Mosaic site in 1999

Mosaic site in 2003

Then there was the second one which only seems to have been used in 2003-04:

Mosaic site in 2004

Then the third version was used in 2004-07 and this is what has been called the old design in this thread. And now we have the fourth version.

What was wrong with the older ones anyway?

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I was just looking at the new Hampton set and the website IMHO is really fantastic on all the different things you can see about an upcoming set, related sets, etc.

A quantum improvement over what existed.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

The design of the page is ok, it's the marketing-speak descriptions that completely turn me off. I have no need for words like "Feel the Passion," "lovingly researched," "CDs encased inside." Sounds more like Pottery Barn or Godiva Chocolates than Mosaic.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...