Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Was recently listening to most of the four(!) volumes of live Woody Shaw material on High Note, plus Stepping Stones (Live at the Village Vanguard), and another other live Woody Shaw date --> "Concert Ensemble at the Berliner Jazztage". And then there's also the Louis Hayes / Woody Shaw quintet and the "Swiss Radio Days Jazz Series, Vol. 5" release. All of these are live recordings of working bands, or in the case of the Berliner Jazztage, a working band augmented with an extra musican or two.

I was thinking -- that's a LOT of documented live recordings by WORKING bands of Woody Shaw -- QUITE a lot -- and in most cases, the majority of the material is original to those bands (compositions by Woody, or by other band members, or contemporaneous tunes associated with the "Woody Shaw" book), and not a whole lot of standards either (just a few, here and there).

What OTHER artists have quite a lot of LIVE material recorded and released, documenting their WORKING bands -- and that also (partially) document their own band's (and bands') book(s) of tunes??

Miles, obviously. Ellington, obviously. Coltrane, obviously.

Who else, that ISN'T as obvious. And, even if somebody doesn't have a deep catalog of leader dates, even two or three live dates might constitute "a lot" of live material, relative to the total number of releases by that artist.

Edited by Rooster_Ties
Posted (edited)

Assuming we aren't talking only about official releases...

Weather Report.

Charles Mingus's sextet/quintet in the spring of 1964

Charles Mingus's group w/Don Pullen and George Adams.

The George Adams/Don Pullen quartet.

Guy

Edited by Guy
Guest donald petersen
Posted

jimmy smith?

i mentioned this in a live chat one night but this is a reasonable example of it-

i said that roosters posts were often like big budget american action movies-full of unecessary special effects and over the top and overdramatic elements (evinced through the use of bolding, italics, exclamation points, smilies, capitalization, etc...)

whereas, in contrast, chuck's posts are like arty european movies which are sometimes hard to understand and are a bit confusing and sometimes sort of spare compared to american flicks but leave you feeling like if you aren't getting it, it is because you aren't smart enough so you will try your hardest to get it and find the meaning hidden within.

Posted

jimmy smith?

i mentioned this in a live chat one night but this is a reasonable example of it-

i said that roosters posts were often like big budget american action movies-full of unecessary special effects and over the top and overdramatic elements (evinced through the use of bolding, italics, exclamation points, smilies, capitalization, etc...)

Not sure if you intended to come off sounding like a big jerk, but if so you succeeded.

Guy

Guest donald petersen
Posted

not at all!

are you serious?

not at all.

i was just joking.

Guest donald petersen
Posted

sorry rooster, i meant no offense.

if i wanted to sit down and watch a movie, i would throw on "mr. and mrs. smith" just as quickly (if not more) as anything else.

but i will reiterate-i think jimmy smith fits the bill....

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...