Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The rules of the game are simple.

In the first post we choose the thesis.

In the second post the antithesis is presented.

In the third post you present the synthesis which is the new thesis and the so the game goes on and on.

YET, it's a musical game.

In the first post the thesis is a piano player. Let's say Bud Powell for example.

The first poster puts a link to a video with Bud Powell.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9P-kpOiT6Eo

The second post is an antithesis for Bud Powell's video, and you also need to give two reasons why.

Let's say you chose Bill Evans as the antithesis

1. Lyrical approach as opposed to Bud Powell's more trumpet like attack.

2. Richer use of left hand chords.

And a link to Bill Evans video.

The synthesis might be Herbie Hancock.

You need to give two reasons why he is a synthesis of Bud Powell and Bill Evans in your ears.

And a link to his video.

It's fun

Posted

OK, that's an easy one. My antithesis to Art Tatum is Thelonious Monk.

Tatum's musical genius was inseparable from his mastery of the piano. He was a technical virtuoso who impressed the greatest classical interpreters. Monk was not interested in that kind of technique. He achieved his own musical mastery by reducing the elements of jazz to startling abstraction. Tatum's ideas flowed in extravagant harmonic detail, Monk's stomped and jerked in bold, angular gestures--arguably no less elegant, but with radically different means and values.

Now--who was the synthesis?

Posted

OK, that's an easy one. My antithesis to Art Tatum is Thelonious Monk.

Tatum's musical genius was inseparable from his mastery of the piano. He was a technical virtuoso who impressed the greatest classical interpreters. Monk was not interested in that kind of technique. He achieved his own musical mastery by reducing the elements of jazz to startling abstraction. Tatum's ideas flowed in extravagant harmonic detail, Monk's stomped and jerked in bold, angular gestures--arguably no less elegant, but with radically different means and values.

Now--who was the synthesis?

Cecil? Muhal?

Posted (edited)

OK, that's an easy one. My antithesis to Art Tatum is Thelonious Monk.

Tatum's musical genius was inseparable from his mastery of the piano. He was a technical virtuoso who impressed the greatest classical interpreters. Monk was not interested in that kind of technique. He achieved his own musical mastery by reducing the elements of jazz to startling abstraction. Tatum's ideas flowed in extravagant harmonic detail, Monk's stomped and jerked in bold, angular gestures--arguably no less elegant, but with radically different means and values.

Now--who was the synthesis?

Cecil? Muhal?

Maybe Cecil and Muhal are good choices but you need to give two reasons for your opinion and examplify it with a video clip.

:)

Edited by Alon Marcus

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...