Alon Marcus Posted January 31, 2007 Report Posted January 31, 2007 The rules of the game are simple. In the first post we choose the thesis. In the second post the antithesis is presented. In the third post you present the synthesis which is the new thesis and the so the game goes on and on. YET, it's a musical game. In the first post the thesis is a piano player. Let's say Bud Powell for example. The first poster puts a link to a video with Bud Powell. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9P-kpOiT6Eo The second post is an antithesis for Bud Powell's video, and you also need to give two reasons why. Let's say you chose Bill Evans as the antithesis 1. Lyrical approach as opposed to Bud Powell's more trumpet like attack. 2. Richer use of left hand chords. And a link to Bill Evans video. The synthesis might be Herbie Hancock. You need to give two reasons why he is a synthesis of Bud Powell and Bill Evans in your ears. And a link to his video. It's fun Quote
Alon Marcus Posted January 31, 2007 Author Report Posted January 31, 2007 Here's a random choice of mine for a thesis to begin spinning the wheels of the game. Art Tatum- Yesterdays Quote
neveronfriday Posted January 31, 2007 Report Posted January 31, 2007 No, I'm NOT going to post an Oscar Peterson video here. NOT. Quote
Tom Storer Posted January 31, 2007 Report Posted January 31, 2007 OK, that's an easy one. My antithesis to Art Tatum is Thelonious Monk. Tatum's musical genius was inseparable from his mastery of the piano. He was a technical virtuoso who impressed the greatest classical interpreters. Monk was not interested in that kind of technique. He achieved his own musical mastery by reducing the elements of jazz to startling abstraction. Tatum's ideas flowed in extravagant harmonic detail, Monk's stomped and jerked in bold, angular gestures--arguably no less elegant, but with radically different means and values. Now--who was the synthesis? Quote
Alexander Hawkins Posted January 31, 2007 Report Posted January 31, 2007 OK, that's an easy one. My antithesis to Art Tatum is Thelonious Monk. Tatum's musical genius was inseparable from his mastery of the piano. He was a technical virtuoso who impressed the greatest classical interpreters. Monk was not interested in that kind of technique. He achieved his own musical mastery by reducing the elements of jazz to startling abstraction. Tatum's ideas flowed in extravagant harmonic detail, Monk's stomped and jerked in bold, angular gestures--arguably no less elegant, but with radically different means and values. Now--who was the synthesis? Cecil? Muhal? Quote
Alon Marcus Posted February 1, 2007 Author Report Posted February 1, 2007 (edited) OK, that's an easy one. My antithesis to Art Tatum is Thelonious Monk. Tatum's musical genius was inseparable from his mastery of the piano. He was a technical virtuoso who impressed the greatest classical interpreters. Monk was not interested in that kind of technique. He achieved his own musical mastery by reducing the elements of jazz to startling abstraction. Tatum's ideas flowed in extravagant harmonic detail, Monk's stomped and jerked in bold, angular gestures--arguably no less elegant, but with radically different means and values. Now--who was the synthesis? Cecil? Muhal? Maybe Cecil and Muhal are good choices but you need to give two reasons for your opinion and examplify it with a video clip. Edited February 1, 2007 by Alon Marcus Quote
Alon Marcus Posted February 2, 2007 Author Report Posted February 2, 2007 I think that Martial Solal plays a synthesis of Tatum's and Monk's styles. 1. He has Tatum virtousity. 2. He has Monk's angular phrasing. Obviously other reasonable choices could be made, but that's part of the freedom the game allows. Solal plays with Montgomery and Griffin Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.