clifford_thornton Posted January 12, 2007 Report Posted January 12, 2007 "HBMF" usually translates to something different, but... Quote
Larry Kart Posted January 12, 2007 Report Posted January 12, 2007 Just finshed listening to the Louis Goldstein recording of "Triadic Memories." Wow. I've heard that the Marilyn Nonken recording is also excellent. Goldstein's recording apparently can be obtained only through him now. Here's his email address: http://www.wfu.edu/music/People/Faculty/fa...-goldstein.html Here's a link to an excellent Feldman site: http://www.cnvill.demon.co.uk/mfhome.htm Under "texts" on this site I particularly recommend a look at No. 16 by Catherine Hirata. There's also a link on this site to a Feldman discussions list "Why Patterns." Quote
T.D. Posted January 12, 2007 Report Posted January 12, 2007 (edited) Happy birthday, Morty! I'm a big fan of Feldman's piano music, and enthusiastically second the Goldstein rec. Purchased it from Forced Exposure some years ago. "Triadic Memories" is coupled with Cage's "1^5", and I generally like Cage's "number pieces" (while stopping short of recommending them for the "general public"...). [Disclaimer: I don't usually spring for multiple recordings of works.] Also suggest "Palais de Mari" and "For Bunita Marcus" (I own the Hildegard Kleeb discs on Hat Art, and haven't found it necessary to look for alternatives). Edited January 12, 2007 by T.D. Quote
Guest youmustbe Posted January 13, 2007 Report Posted January 13, 2007 Do any of you have the Flux Quartet Feldman? Flux has done Keith Jarrett's music for me, which I've had transcribed for string quartet, and hopefully there will be more soon....difficult with all the changes in the record biz...probably a string quartet version of Keith's Spheres. The Flux's Scelsi at Miller Theater was rather crappy, sad to say. Only the Arditti can do that shit, although I think Dave Douglas or somebody is trying to do a "Jazz' version of Scelsi, which might work. BTW In the last century I asked Dave to do one of Keith's compositions, trumpet and player piano...he didn't want to. Too bad, woulda, coulda been interesting. Quote
Larry Kart Posted January 13, 2007 Report Posted January 13, 2007 Do any of you have the Flux Quartet Feldman? Don't have it (or the Ives Ensemble recording) myself, but here's John Story's review of it from the Feldman "Why Patterns" list that compares it to the Ives Ensemble recording: FELDMAN String Quartet No. 2 . Flux Quartet . MODE 112 (5 CDs or 1 DVD 6:06:07) This is one of the monuments of modern music, both in ambition and in sheer length. Written for the Kronos Quartet in 1983, it stretches every possible parameter of the string quartet. Both of Feldman's string quartets are enormous. The first lasted a hundred minutes at the premiere (the recording drops about thirty minutes off that, possibly simply by playing at Feldman's stated tempo - I have never compared the score to the recording). Presumably feeling he needed to top himself in what is the most exalted medium of Western music, Feldman's second string quartet is his largest work. Taken at the slower of the tempo range given in the score it runs just under five hours. Taking it at the faster option reduces the overall playing time about fifteen minutes. The most obvious difference in this, the work's second recording, with the first by the Ives Ensemble on Hat(now)Art is that the Flux Quartet take about an hour and ten minutes more over the music, dropping the tempo down to about quarter note=50 from Feldman's specified 63-66. As it turns out this is perhaps the least significant aspect of the performance, one that is quite different from that given by the Ives Ensemble. As Christian Wolff points out in his notes to the present recording, the perception of passing time is virtually identical between the two. There is also not much of a price differential since the Ives set of four CDs retails for the same forty dollars as the Flux Quartet's five (or single DVD which allows the listener to hear the performance uninterrupted as in a concert situation). For those unfamiliar with Feldman's late style and his music for strings in particular, the work is perhaps paradoxically derived from the concentrated early music of Anton Webern. Modules are presented, varied, discarded to be taken up again, perhaps an hour later, in a continuing mosaic of sound that recalls the experience of examining Feldman's beloved oriental rugs at close range. His ability to glue this together to make a genuinely continuous whole is one of the many remarkable things about the late music and there is no music I know of that explores more thoroughly the process of memory. String Quartet No. 2 and the almost equally enormous For Philip Guston that followed in 1984 form the climax of what might be called the late music with the very late music effectively beginning with For Bunita Marcus in 1985. With that work Feldman pared his materials down to the absolute minimum, something that is presaged in the second string quartet's extended second half which is almost entirely chordal, without dynamic changes beyond occasional decrescendos. For all that Feldman notated all his late works quite precisely, his spoken and published statements offer obvious contradictions to the notation, particularly in works such as the pieces for instruments that involve potentially flexible tuning. To a pianist, G double flat is identical in pitch to F natural. To a string player (or brass player or a singer) there is a tradition of shading the note so that the two notes are slightly different. James Fulkerson has gone into print a number of times with his belief that in Feldman the two notes should be the same, if for no other reason then that Feldman composed at the piano which of course does not offer any tuning options whatsoever, but Feldman suggested otherwise in his published writings. He also only used the elaborate system of double sharps and flats in instruments that were capable of playing them, which suggests he wanted them heard as well as seen. Similarly Aki Takahashi has commented that Feldman's famously finicky rhythms were intended to indicate a kind of continuous rubato, so that patterns were never repeated exactly, rather than intended to be followed precisely, something she in fact does not do in her own performances which are as exact as anyone's. Finally there is the question of string vibrato. In his writings Feldman seemed to express a preference for string playing without vibrato but in the performances he himself conducted, most notably the gorgeous Viola in My Life I-III, Karen Philips plays with the same vibrato that she would use in any other music. So there you have it. The Ives Ensemble plays consistently without vibrato and, if anything, emphasizes the tiny gradations of tuning. The Flux Quartet offer a much more conventional string quartet sound, including vibrato selectively applied which makes the tiny shifts away from even tempered tuning much more discrete. The result adds a degree of sensuous beauty to the music that is deeply seductive. How they do in live performance is anyone's guess, but in the relatively easier confines of the recording studio, the Flux Quartet maintain their level of tone production and their rhythmic control throughout which again goes a long way towards making their slower tempo not seem slow. They are aided in this by the recorded sound which is more distant than the Ives Ensemble receives from Hat(now)Art. Not only does this increase the glamour, if you will, of the quartet's basic sound, it also makes the dynamic changes, which range in the score from ppppp to ff, easier to register in playback. The flip side to this is that the Ives Ensemble makes the music sound newer, stranger, much less connected to the long tradition of Western music for string quartet. Feldman wrote about the quartet as dialectic between opposites. This utterly gorgeous performance and recording sets up its own dialectic with the Ives Ensemble's approach. In an ideal world one should own both performances, the Ives Ensemble for their modernist fervor, the Flux Quartet for making the link to the long tradition of Western music, that Feldman so emphatically felt himself to be a part of, explicit. Obviously the highest recommendation. Quote
Larry Kart Posted January 13, 2007 Report Posted January 13, 2007 Another "Why Patterns" list response to the two SQ II recordings, from Glenn Freeman: I prefer the MODE version just a bit (they are both very good). For me the MODE version sounds better over the longer period of time (better "pacing", if that is the correct term). Also, the sound on the MODE DVD is quite amazing (better than CDs) and no need to change 4 CDs. The performances are not that much different, when viewed at the motive (small) level (I did not listen with a score ... perhaps John Story will do this). At the beginning of the work I found the Flux Quartet to be more "Stravinskian" in rhythm, with a generic Dorothy Delay-type of "Julliard" expressivo string sound ... which I do not like for Feldman! But then, surprisingly, I preferred the Flux's sensitivity (and pacing) over time as they delved further into the work. If you prefer a more "mature/cool/objective" sound at the small level, then the Ives Ensemble might be the better choice. Quote
7/4 Posted January 12, 2009 Author Report Posted January 12, 2009 Happy Happy Joy Joy Morty. dB Quote
7/4 Posted January 12, 2010 Author Report Posted January 12, 2010 Morton Feldman (January 12, 1926 – September 3, 1987) was an American composer, born in New York City. Quote
7/4 Posted January 13, 2011 Author Report Posted January 13, 2011 Happy Birthday Morton Feldman. You made a difference. Quote
alocispepraluger102 Posted January 13, 2011 Report Posted January 13, 2011 Happy Birthday Morton Feldman. You made a difference. a true visionary Quote
Teasing the Korean Posted January 29, 2019 Report Posted January 29, 2019 Bump. I have been listening to lots for Morton Feldman on YouTube for the past few years. The longer I listen to him, the more awestruck I am. He seems to link together many of my musical interests but in a completely singular way. Quote
Д.Д. Posted January 29, 2019 Report Posted January 29, 2019 (edited) I really like (relatively brisk) Ivan Ilic's version of 'For Bunita Marcus': http://paraty.fr/en/portfolio/ivan-ilic-plays-morton-feldman/ . Beautifully recorded too. Edited January 29, 2019 by Д.Д. Quote
7/4 Posted January 30, 2019 Author Report Posted January 30, 2019 7 hours ago, Teasing the Korean said: Bump. I have been listening to lots for Morton Feldman on YouTube for the past few years. The longer I listen to him, the more awestruck I am. He seems to link together many of my musical interests but in a completely singular way. Try him on CD or even on DVD audio, you have to hear the transparency of HIFI...it's perfect for his music. Quote
Д.Д. Posted September 21, 2019 Report Posted September 21, 2019 A new complete piano works 5-CD box set: http://anothertimbre.com/mortonfeldmanpiano.html Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.