Jump to content

What is swing?


jazz1

Recommended Posts

I'm tempted to quote Fats Walller and say, "If you don't know what it is, for heaven's sake don't mess with it!"

But I won't, because I don't want to be one of *those* jazz fans who look down their noses at people who dare to ask such questions.

"Swing" is hard to define, but in simplest terms it is this: "In music, a swung note or shuffle note is the rhythmic device in which the duration of the initial note in a pair is augmented and that of the second is diminished. A swing or shuffle rhythm is the rhythm produced by playing repeated pairs of notes in this way. Lilting can refer to swinging, but might also indicate syncopation or other subtle ways of interpreting and shaping musical time.

In some jazz music, especially of the big band era, there is a convention that pairs of written eighth notes are not played equally--as the notation would otherwise be understood--but with the first longer than the second. The first note of each of these pairs is often understood to be twice as long as the second, implying a quarter note-eighth note triplet feel, but in practice the difference is rarely that pronounced. This is an assumed convention of notation in many styles of jazz, but usually does not apply to jazz before the early 1930s, latin jazz, bebop, or to the work of composers writing in the 1950s or later, unless "swing" is specified in the score." (Wikipedia entry on swing)

Swing indicated a big musical leap from the syncopated rhythm of jazz in the 1920s. It changed the whole feeling of jazz. It made for a more laid-back sound. In comparison, '20s jazz sounds frantic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my experience, there are two interpretations of "swing":

One decribes a specific style of music (which gets into the eighth/triplet-feel business).

The other describes the energy (most often the rhythmic momentum, but not only that) created by any music (not just jazz) that affects you physically (toe tapping etc.) and emotionally. It moves you and makes you want to move.

I frequently use the term "swing" to describe non-jazz music. For example, I think Beethoven swung hard!

That's how I see it. Your mileage may vary. :)

(guess I kind of "Roostered out" with the parentheses) (;))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my experience, there are two interpretations of "swing":

One decribes a specific style of music (which gets into the eighth/triplet-feel business).

The other describes the energy (most often the rhythmic momentum, but not only that) created by any music (not just jazz) that affects you physically (toe tapping etc.) and emotionally. It moves you and makes you want to move.

I frequently use the term "swing" to describe non-jazz music. For example, I think Beethoven swung hard!

That's how I see it. Your mileage may vary. :)

(guess I kind of "Roostered out" with the parentheses) (;))

Hey, HEY. Nobody goes overboard with the parentheses like me- nobody (Rooster is more about enlarged text, bold, red and blue, etc)... (oh, and btw, I agree with you on "swing" and "Swing")... (like they say, if you have to ask...).

( :lol: )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The effect should be a forward momentum. The time should keep moving. Not start stop.

I sometimes think of Elvin Jones playing as someone walking who is falling forward but never hits the ground :-)

By contrast, Monk (who also swung) is the musical equivilent of a man walking a high-wire. He makes it look like he doesn't know where his foot is going to land, but it always lands exactly where it needs to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was just flipping through the Jost "Free Jazz" book (having spent far too much time with said materials writing theses and whatnot), and the word "flowing" is used (as well as some terminology that would just as well describe syncopation in general--i.e., the displacement of accents, etc.). Motion or momentum, again, is what I hear often. But then, that's the academic side of things...

There's a strong duality between the "spiritual" nature of swing and any sort of theoretical definition, and it's interesting to see what you'll "reach for" first when the question is posed. Like Free For All mentioned Beethoven--I'd say the same about Derek Bailey!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...