Dmitry Posted October 11, 2006 Report Posted October 11, 2006 Maybe I am wrong but I see substantially more Blue Note Mono 4000 series pressings on eBay than Stereo pressings. Does that justify saying that BN pressed fewer Stereo Lps before their sale to Liberty? Also, I have read somewhere that from the early 60s on BN recorded in Stereo, then down-mixed to Mono in post-production. Is that true? Quote
Teasing the Korean Posted October 11, 2006 Report Posted October 11, 2006 Mono pressings on most labels in the US outnumbered stereo at least through 1966. Mono copies of US albums from 67 and 68 are much harder to find, because they were pressed in fewer numbers. As far as I know, all those RVG recordings were done to 2 track and mixed to mono from there. I think when confronted with choices, getting the right balance for the mono mix was his priority. The bass and piano tend to have more presence on the mono versions than they do on the stereo. Quote
Daniel A Posted October 11, 2006 Report Posted October 11, 2006 I happened to read a lot of old threads on BN LPs recently, so I know where to find some anwers to this one too. >Here< Quote
jazzhound Posted October 11, 2006 Report Posted October 11, 2006 at some point in the sixties the stereo blue note's just sounded better than the mono's to my ears. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.