Big Beat Steve Posted yesterday at 10:51 AM Report Posted yesterday at 10:51 AM Thanks for your comments. I was just puzzled that the fact that there are two tapes in circulation where one tape has additional tracks (beyond the idential tracks on both tapes) would necessarily mean that there were two sets played. So if I got you right you presume that the additional tracks that are one tape only come from a second set that was payed? Quote
Dan Gould Posted yesterday at 11:19 AM Report Posted yesterday at 11:19 AM Thanks for the insight David, my copy of the recording that does circulate came from the opener of this thread, MartyJazz. He had dozens of reels that I digitized for him - this must have been nearly 20 years ago. Quote
Big Beat Steve Posted yesterday at 12:33 PM Report Posted yesterday at 12:33 PM 1 hour ago, Big Beat Steve said: ... So if I got you right you presume that the additional tracks that are one tape only come from a second set that was payed? Typo correction: ... that the additional tracks that are on one tape only come from a second set that was played Quote
Kevin Bresnahan Posted yesterday at 01:59 PM Report Posted yesterday at 01:59 PM 2 hours ago, Dan Gould said: Thanks for the insight David, my copy of the recording that does circulate came from the opener of this thread, MartyJazz. He had dozens of reels that I digitized for him - this must have been nearly 20 years ago. MartyJazz hasn't posted since 2018. Does anyone know if he's still around? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.