Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks for your comments. I was just puzzled that the fact that there are two tapes in circulation where one tape has additional tracks (beyond the idential tracks on both tapes) would necessarily mean that there were two sets played. So if I got you right you presume that the additional tracks that are one tape only come from a second set that was payed?

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Thanks for the insight David, my copy of the recording that does circulate came from the opener of this thread, MartyJazz. He had dozens of reels that I digitized for him - this must have been nearly 20 years ago.

Posted
1 hour ago, Big Beat Steve said:

... So if I got you right you presume that the additional tracks that are one tape only come from a second set that was payed?

Typo correction:
... that the additional tracks that are on one tape only come from a second set that was played

Posted
2 hours ago, Dan Gould said:

Thanks for the insight David, my copy of the recording that does circulate came from the opener of this thread, MartyJazz. He had dozens of reels that I digitized for him - this must have been nearly 20 years ago.

MartyJazz hasn't posted since 2018. Does anyone know if he's still around?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...