Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

from the ArtsJournal Artful Manager blog:

NPR had a thoughtful overview last night on the challenge of hearing or distributing even fairly recent American recorded music. According to a study by the Library of Congress discussed in the story, "over 70 percent of American music recorded before 1965 is not legally available in the United States." Through issues of copyright clearance and lack of a commercial market, these recorded works are unlikely to enter the commercial market again, and unable to enter a noncommercial market either.

Half of the challenge is fairly obvious, and common to the nonprofit world, as well: there's a ton of content, and only a narrow pipe to shove it through. Because recordings take time, energy, and money to re-release, companies are picky about what they spend their time on. The same could be said of other audio heritage distribution channels like symphonies, chamber groups, jazz ensembles, or rock bands. There are only so many groups, who perform only so many times each year. Simple math will show why the bulk of composed works will never be heard again.

The other half of the challenge is copyright...the fact that a recorded work contains a bundle of owners that have a say and an interest in whether or not a recording is reproduced. Someone owns the music, someone owns the performance that was recorded, someone owns the master recording. For works recorded before 1972, that bundle of rights can be an endless maze with no way through (if you're particularly interested in navigating that maze, see the Library of Congress report from last month).

Arts organizations are often in the business of stewarding and making accessible great creative works of recent and distant history. It's sad to think that such a vast collection of our country's cultural past may be forever out of our reach.

--eric

Edited by Dr. Rat
Posted

Blame Mickey Mouse for the United States' current laws. It's his multi-billion dollar image that keeps getting the number extended. Since "Steamboat Willie" is once again coming up on public domain, you can bet Disney's lawyers are working Congress to get it extended again. Maybe what they should do is simply give Disney a special law to extend their copyrights to "infinity and beyond". :)

Posted

Blame Mickey Mouse for the United States' current laws. It's his multi-billion dollar image that keeps getting the number extended. Since "Steamboat Willie" is once again coming up on public domain, you can bet Disney's lawyers are working Congress to get it extended again. Maybe what they should do is simply give Disney a special law to extend their copyrights to "infinity and beyond". :)

I don't mean to duck the issue, but that's just goofy. :crazy:

:g

Posted

is anyone going to buy the report- if so can you post it here? many would find it most informative

Posted (edited)

The full text of the December report is free online. I downloaded it. No need to post it here (too long).

In any case, it's about what libraries and archives can legally do, NOT rogues like me and my site on preserving Cajun music.

Edited by It Should be You

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...