Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 6/10/2021 at 10:46 PM, David Ayers said:

Discourses of hate and/or violence are one thing (Shepp? Gayle?); paranoid conspiracy theories without those things are a bit less harmful. 

Expand  

Actually...rhetorical safety valve vs inciting actual death-inducing behaviors...you tell me which is more harmful.

No absolutes on any of this outside of contexts. And looks like for all of Shepp's and Gayle's "discourses", things are still waiting to change, whereas, how many dead people from COVID-denialism? How about a damn near violent overthrow of the US Government (and next time they're coming with guns, they say!?

This false equivalency stuff is a runaway train of jet-fuled suicide, there's some context for your ass.

  • Replies 329
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I can safely say I've bought my last Evan Parker album. As a continental European, I'm tired of being insulted and threatened by brexit-tards, especially the really crazy, mendacious ones. Evan can stuff his soprano where the sun don't shine.

Posted (edited)
  On 6/11/2021 at 8:14 AM, erwbol said:

Evan can stuff his soprano where the sun don't shine.

Expand  

No doubt he will develop some exciting new circular breathing techniques. It might liven up the next solo release.

  On 6/11/2021 at 7:38 AM, David Ayers said:

He is said to have joined in with Jones/Baraka in his anti Semitic period. They are reported as doing anti-Semitic street agitation together. 

Expand  

Oh. Thanks. I wish I didn't know that. It shows you should be careful what questions you ask.

Edit: It still won't make me throw out my Shepps though. I still don't understand getting upset by a musician's views as long as it doesn't come across in the music. Parker remains safe in my house, next to the Soft Machines and the rest. 

Edited by Rabshakeh
Posted

The guy has his views, however wacky they might be. He is voicing them from time to time (to a grand worldwide audience of maybe 500 people). The Wire says this makes him "selfish and irresponsible"? How is that? Who is he supposed to be responsible to? Why can't he be selfish? He is not a government official, he does not formulate public policy, his views have no implications. As far as I am concerned, Evan Parker can say whatever the fuck he wants.     

Posted (edited)

Agreed. He's a musician, not a politician or a pamphleteer. He's not writing songs about how Brexit is great, like Van Morrison is about his views.  If you didn't read about his personal views you could listen to his music for 100 years and remain none the wiser. 

Edited by Rabshakeh
Posted
  On 6/11/2021 at 8:20 AM, Rabshakeh said:

Oh. Thanks. I wish I didn't know that. It shows you should be careful what questions you ask.

Expand  

Kofsky mentions the Shepp/Baraka leafleting  in his Black Nationalism/John Coltrane book, and I have always known it, but I don’t know where you’d look for full information. 

Posted
  On 6/11/2021 at 8:43 AM, erwbol said:

Of course retards have freedom of speech. I'm just not into financing their soapboxes.

Expand  

I'm all in agreement, but Parker is not a UKIP spokesperson! He has barely publicised his views on Brexit. 

  On 6/11/2021 at 8:50 AM, David Ayers said:

Kofsky mentions the Shepp/Baraka leafleting  in his Black Nationalism/John Coltrane book, and I have always known it, but I don’t know where you’d look for full information. 

Expand  

Thanks. I have it on my shelf and will have a look. 

But, again, Shepp is not a high profile anti-Semite using his fame to publish his beliefs (Baraka might be a different story). It's not even something you can find easily from a Google search.

It isn't the old Celine/Pound conundrum of whether you should or shouldn't enjoy hateful art, because hateful content in either Shepp's or Parker's work is lacking. 

Posted
  On 6/11/2021 at 8:56 AM, Д.Д. said:

Is it possible to disagree with somebody without calling him / her a retard?  

Expand  

Like disagreeing with an intelligent design advocate about natural selection and not considering/calling them a retard? Or a flat earther? No.

Posted
  On 6/11/2021 at 8:32 AM, Д.Д. said:

The guy has his views, however wacky they might be. He is voicing them from time to time (to a grand worldwide audience of maybe 500 people). The Wire says this makes him "selfish and irresponsible"? How is that? Who is he supposed to be responsible to? Why can't he be selfish? He is not a government official, he does not formulate public policy, his views have no implications. As far as I am concerned, Evan Parker can say whatever the fuck he wants.     

Expand  

Yes, he can. Just as Tony Herrington has the right to express his opinion on Evan's views and the way in which they are expressed.

I think you may be underestimating Evan's position as a "Grand Old Man". Few other musicians (in this, admittedly, small world of free jazz) would cause so much disappointment and dismay with such statements. When I read the Wire piece, it is mainly about that, not about Evan's freedom of speech (which TH obviously acknowledges).

Posted

Grand Old Fish of his tiny pond he might be, but I can't believe there is anyone who is having their heads turned by what he is saying, particularly given that he is not even saying it directly.

The Wire's article criticising him is doing more to publish those views than Parker himself is.

Posted (edited)

I’m long familiar with these topics (as a professional scholar) re. e.g. Pound et al. I’m not going to set out my stall on that here.

 

Anyone can decide whether and how to engage with any artist based on feeling about their opinion. In the case of EP, maybe some are disappointed that their assumptions about the leftist nature of this sub-genre are not confirmed. Not only does it not surprise me, but it is of a piece with a strain of autodidacticism found in other artists of that generation (think ley lines, Wilhelm Reich, LSD, Ron Hubbard, etc. etc.). So - yeah. 

 

EP’s my neighbor, so I’m not going to bale on him. 

Edited by David Ayers
Posted (edited)
  On 6/11/2021 at 10:06 AM, David Ayers said:

Not only does it not surprise me, but it is of a piece with a strain of autodidacticism found in other artists of that generation (think ley lines, Wilhelm Reich, LSD, Ron Hubbard, etc. etc.).

Expand  

This is an interesting take. I have often wondered with Braxton, for example, whether his curious terminology is a result of his having had to put everything together for himself. Some of the "scholarship" that Braxton refers to and leans upon is definitely on the outlying edges, albeit with Braxton it feeds back to an intriguing and unique humanist viewpoint, rather than something unpleasant. 

But Evan Parker is hardly an autodidact. I thought he studied biology at Birmingham Uni. 

Also, after the reference to Ezra Pound it took me a minute to puzzle out which "EP" you meant.

Edited by Rabshakeh
Posted
  On 6/11/2021 at 10:46 AM, Rabshakeh said:

This is an interesting take. I have often wondered with Braxton, for example, whether his curious terminology is a result of his having had to put everything together for himself. Some of the "scholarship" that Braxton refers to and leans upon is definitely on the outlying edges, albeit with Braxton it feeds back to an intriguing and unique humanist viewpoint, rather than something unpleasant. 

Expand  

I haven't read Braxton's own writings beyond liner notes, but despite the dense language, he is no Judith Butler. His musical system(s) see to that.

Posted
  On 6/11/2021 at 11:16 AM, erwbol said:

I haven't read Braxton's own writings beyond liner notes, but despite the dense language, he is no Judith Butler. His musical system(s) see to that.

Expand  

What do you mean? Is Judith Butler notoriously wordy? I have never read Butler's work. 

Braxton is not so much wordy as idiosyncratic, I think. 

Posted
  On 6/11/2021 at 10:04 AM, Rabshakeh said:

Grand Old Fish of his tiny pond he might be, but I can't believe there is anyone who is having their heads turned by what he is saying, particularly given that he is not even saying it directly.

The Wire's article criticising him is doing more to publish those views than Parker himself is.

Expand  

No heads turned? Then why are we discussing it here? In fact it was even you who brought it to the attention here with your initial post about his piece for Sons d'hiver.

Posted (edited)

 

  On 6/11/2021 at 10:17 AM, erwbol said:

Appeal to authority? Lame.

Expand  

 

I think what I’m saying is that I’m used to deciding for myself how and whether to deal with this kind of thing, and that everyone can decide for themselves. 

 

Re. counter-cultural idiosyncrasies, I remember when I was growing up that Thor Heyerdahl and Erich von Däniken were common talking-points and seemed not easily distinguishable. 

 

Edited by David Ayers
Posted
  On 6/11/2021 at 11:24 AM, corto maltese said:

No heads turned? Then why are we discussing it here? In fact it was even you who brought it to the attention here with your initial post about his piece for Sons d'hiver.

Expand  

Yes, but no-one is seriously questioning whether he might be right.

At least, I hope not.

  • 3 years later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...