AllenLowe Posted June 17, 2005 Report Posted June 17, 2005 I hope he's not still involved in those diet supplement pyramid schemes - Quote
AllenLowe Posted June 17, 2005 Report Posted June 17, 2005 I hope he's not still trying to pass himself off as Clementine to impress chicks - Quote
AllenLowe Posted June 17, 2005 Report Posted June 17, 2005 well, I'm just tired of his borrowing money from me - Quote
Guest Posted June 18, 2005 Report Posted June 18, 2005 ← Golly I dunno - I thought this was an intelligent forum not a drunken circus of introspection and denial, or something. Was it something I said? Quote
Guest Posted June 18, 2005 Report Posted June 18, 2005 Ignoring the offtopic posts (shame on you guys; I'm glad I've never done that! ), I had the same thought: why record as one side rather than track by track? ← guys guys - this is getting silly - spam in disguise? Oy vay! You should hear yourselves. What nonsense! Spam is spam, it doesn't know what it am so it cannot 'disguise' itself. I am me! I am not spam! Spam am I not. Anyway - I'm not one to be overly insulted unless it involves my choice of clothing so be warned. Back to the topic and just to prove I am a real person of sorts: I contend: You should normally record vinyl LPs as 'whole side' files because only that way can you be absolutely sure to maintain the original LP producers choice of volume levels and timings of track pauses. Any change you make should be made across the 'whole side' file before editing and saving as tracks. The process should be balanced by keeping the whole B side volumes the same if possible - but not all LPs are the same db cut on both sides - however most 'sides' are mixed to play in sequence. I am constantly reminded by clients not to f___ with this timing. If you're transferring any kind of 'continuous' LP eg. Dark Side of The Moon or anything by Stevie Wonder, you simply have to respect the seamless track changes and adhere to the same volume across all tracks of either side of the LP. I suggest that it is equally important to maintain the volume levels across those albums - especially familiar ones - that have gaps beween the songs. Those things were labours of love for the artist - why snafu with the volume they wanted? To throw the question back, what are the advantages of recording track-by-track? I think I was talking about DVD-audio discs... at high resolution. From home. Tips and tricks and friendly advice-swapping. Is that not allowed? Grrr.. Now please be nice. Colin AKA SeeWhyAudioNotSpamButaPersonWithIdeasToShare Quote
couw Posted June 18, 2005 Report Posted June 18, 2005 ← Golly I dunno - I thought this was an intelligent forum not a drunken circus of introspection and denial, or something. Was it something I said? ← not at all, it was in response to AllenLowe's trolling and baiting Quote
sidewinder Posted June 18, 2005 Report Posted June 18, 2005 (edited) Keep it coming, SeeWhyAudio - I am looking at setting up an 'audiophile' LP copying capability and value any suggestions as to how to go about it. Edited June 18, 2005 by sidewinder Quote
Guest Posted June 18, 2005 Report Posted June 18, 2005 Keep it coming, SeeWhyAudio - I am looking at setting up an 'audiophile' LP copying capability and value any suggestions as to how to go about it. ← Hey there, What's your current vinyl set-up? What computer do you operate? What's your budget? Col Quote
AllenLowe Posted June 18, 2005 Report Posted June 18, 2005 hey COUW - it ain't trolling and baiting it's just some light hearted fun - something which you, in your eternal narcissistic nastiness, obviously know nothing about - but maybe it's a language issue - Quote
neveronfriday Posted June 18, 2005 Report Posted June 18, 2005 Some people call it light-hearted fun, others don't. Quote
AllenLowe Posted June 18, 2005 Report Posted June 18, 2005 true - it's just that couw made it, typically, into something personal - sorry, I just do not like that guy - Quote
neveronfriday Posted June 18, 2005 Report Posted June 18, 2005 true - it's just that couw made it, typically, into something personal - sorry, I just do not like that guy - ← That's your good right. But to attribute "eternal narcissistic nastiness" to a long-standing member who, in my opinion, hasn't displayed anything of the kind is just bad form. Especially in a thread in which your contributions could have easily been seen by others than couw in exactly the light he described them. Quote
sidewinder Posted June 18, 2005 Report Posted June 18, 2005 Keep it coming, SeeWhyAudio - I am looking at setting up an 'audiophile' LP copying capability and value any suggestions as to how to go about it. ← Hey there, What's your current vinyl set-up? What computer do you operate? What's your budget? Col ← Linn LP12 turntable/Naim amp rig Fujitsu/Siemens P4 Zippo Quote
mjzee Posted June 18, 2005 Report Posted June 18, 2005 true - it's just that couw made it, typically, into something personal - sorry, I just do not like that guy - ← And why share that with us? Quote
mjzee Posted June 18, 2005 Report Posted June 18, 2005 why DVD-A? I'm very impressed by SACD ← Are there SACD recorders for the home? Quote
AllenLowe Posted June 18, 2005 Report Posted June 18, 2005 "And why share that with us?" because I'm just a sharing type of guy - and unlike more than a few of you I have a sense of humor - it's interesting - when somebody disagrees with you guys, attacks with sarcasm or humor are seen as a justifiable tactic - however, if it's a friend or someone you agree with or like, you explain how inappropriate it all is - Quote
AllenLowe Posted June 18, 2005 Report Posted June 18, 2005 and couw is, pure and simple, a nasty guy who seems to revel in his nastiness - his history of activity on this board does not make him immune from criticisn, just as my 35 years of activity in the jazz world does not make me immune - Quote
wolff Posted June 18, 2005 Report Posted June 18, 2005 Are there any stand alone(audio component) DVD-A recorders??? How much?? I'd rather go this way than the computer route, if possible. Quote
king ubu Posted June 18, 2005 Report Posted June 18, 2005 I'm really having a hard time finding answers to all the refined questions Allen asked. This site may help him answer the question about what is the capital of Montana. Then, here's a sample of Hoagy's "Stardust" - nice chance to train your ears a bit again, and find out about them changes yourself! Here, then, is a website about professors (they should know, shouldn't they?) trying to work out why birds sing: http://www.physorg.com/news3849.html. This book may also be helpful, however only in respect to a very special and man-made species (but aren't all taxonomies man-made, in the end?): That's how far I've come by now... if I have a few more glasses of guinness, I may or may not fine a few more answers. Oh, I forgot one: the monkey/language question is highly debatable one - maybe Allen knows the answer but just doesn't want us to know? Quote
neveronfriday Posted June 19, 2005 Report Posted June 19, 2005 and couw is, pure and simple, a nasty guy who seems to revel in his nastiness - his history of activity on this board does not make him immune from criticisn, just as my 35 years of activity in the jazz world does not make me immune - ← Quote
AllenLowe Posted June 19, 2005 Report Posted June 19, 2005 thank you, King Ubu - that still does not explain why there were only Three Sounds, however - Quote
_forumlogo.png.a607ef20a6e0c299ab2aa6443aa1f32e.png)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.