Dan Gould Posted June 28, 2003 Report Posted June 28, 2003 I thought it was supposed to be better than the first, which I caught on HBO last year some time. Well they are resorting to a whole lot more T&A so that should tell you how hollow the plot and story is going to be. Excuse me, but isn't this the reason to see a Charlie's Angels movie to begin with? Me and a friend saw the first one in the theater and had a fine time. My mother and sister-in-law walked out in the middle they were so annoyed. I tried to explain to them that the whole point is that its going to be stupid and goofy and cheesy and filled with T 'n A. This thread notwithstanding, me and that very same friend will be heading to the theater next Saturday, disengage our brain and (hopefully) be entertained. Quote
jazzbo Posted June 28, 2003 Report Posted June 28, 2003 Dan has the right idea about this movie! How about just one angel if the budget will only allow it. . . . Quote
BruceH Posted July 1, 2003 Report Posted July 1, 2003 This is the worst movie I've seen in a long time. DO NOT SEE IT. DO NOT LET YOUR FRIENDS, FAMILY, LOVED ONES OR ANYONE ELSE SEE THIS MOVIE. That's funny....I was expecting something on the level of Ozu, Renoir, or Tati at their best. Quote
jacman Posted July 1, 2003 Report Posted July 1, 2003 the only thing i can say RE: Charlie's Angels, the TV show, part 1 (which i had to see with my spouse) and part 2 which i will never see: one can take this as 'Kiss My Ass' or Vomit. your pick. Quote
catesta Posted July 1, 2003 Report Posted July 1, 2003 I coudn't be any happier that this movie is not drawing crowds as they thought it would. Quote
_forumlogo.png.a607ef20a6e0c299ab2aa6443aa1f32e.png)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.