Marzette Watts And Company esp 1044

[l p]

can someone confirm that the track timings of the ESP cd

Marzette Watts And Company esp 1044

are: 18m, 6m, and 13m, not 18, 8, 7 as listed on the esp site, and allmusic.

thanks

[Brandon Burke]

can someone confirm that the track timings of the ESP cd

Marzette Watts And Company esp 1044

are: 18m, 6m, and 13m, not 18, 8, 7 as listed on the esp site, and allmusic.

thanks

I have the LP, so I can only venture a guess here. On side b, the first track takes up considerably less wax than the second, leading me to believe that your six/thirteen guess is probably correct.

[Michael Fitzgerald]

Correct CD timings are in the Henry Grimes discography on my website.

17:54/6:03/13:18

I seem to recall mention somewhere that labels on some LP copies were reversed.

Mike

[Brandon Burke]

I just sent this correction to Chris at AMG.

[l p]

does one of the tracks (track 2?) start with a couple of seconds of a solo bass clarinet?

[Michael Fitzgerald]

yes

[l p]

thanks

[l p]

the track timings of ESP cd 1029 'Charles Tyler Ensemble' are off as well.

there are probably timing problems throughout the esp catalog.

[l p]

Correct CD timings are in the Henry Grimes discography on my website.

17:54/6:03/13:18

this is peculiar, because the day before my posting about this, the timings on your Henry Grimes discography for this session were as wrong as the timings on allmusic.

[clifford_thornton]

The plates were switched on the second pressing of the LP, so that track one (A) is on side B and vice versa (i.e., deadwax lists ESPS-1044-B for the side-long A side piece). I believe that they took the CD from a second pressing of the LP and mis-tracked it accordingly. The Get Back LP reish also follows suit in this error.