alocispepraluger102

Make that a double! MG actually was gargling the peroxide for a sore throat.

H2O2(sic)

and big ben's arms are hands.

a concert coming up this fall in san francisco which may be added to this list is satoko fuji and myra melford.

You would probably have to make Sue a High Priestess? and charge admission.

Instrumentalists singing/Humming/grunting along can/should not be called jazz singers. Besides that, I don't mind if they do - Jarrett would be a lot more boring to me if he didn't .... The one singer that always makes me wish someone would have stuffed his mouth with a stocking at the session is Milt Jackson. Simply horrifying. Terrible vibrato. Urghh!!! aloc has a limelight vinyl, 'mjq at the museum of modern art', which may be the worst ever mjq recording for many reasons, including milt's extended 'vocal' version of, 'i saw a flying saucer.' paying a nickle for that recording would be too much, and aloc bought it new at full price.

grady tate should, and did.

aloc begs to politely differ.

what sort of person could like that darjeeling stuff?

thanks for the insight. scores of musicians have fewer qualms than you, it would appear. (as a side comment, one of my friends, the head of jazz studies at youngstown state, refuses to play his virtuoso trumpet wearing lederhosen)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070811/ap_on_...big_ben_s_bongs

george williams, who did all the slick gleason string arrangements?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070811/ap_on_re_us/gay_funeral

time for aloc to listen to 'Dave Frishberg I'm Hip,' and fetch 'song of the thin man' from the library.

the aloc vehemently agrees.

that was a magnificent line, 'RD'

here's a review: http://www.starpulse.com/Music/Brubeck,_Da...P6198/R1113514/

i hear he had a pretty hip band in the 40's but i dont have any of his music. i remember wilis conover played a great deal of his music. any recommendations?

straight or on the rocks?

http://www.allaboutjazz.com/php/article.php?id=25693

If built correctly, the mudslide should have no affect on a house's foundation. My house is built on a hillside (though not with those frightening pillars - they scare even me!) but it's built on concrete pilings that go down 40 feet into the bedrock. It's rock and not "mud," of course, but even if the hillside that our house was built on were to wash away, the house would still be standing on its foundation supports. Exactly what happened to my old house...before it burned in the Oakland Hills fire. having a home burn, losing a spouse or child, or a divorce. how on earth does one survive such and continue living? Is your question serious? Do you really consider those things equal? I'm divorced, as are other board members, and have survived and continued living. I don't consider that anywhere close to the same thing as losing a child or spouse. Losing a child or your spouse must be about the hardest thing anyone could go through. A divorce is definitely traumatic and life altering, but I still don't think it's the same. having not experienced divorce personally, i really dont know about its psychological impact, but i would expect it to be a severe blow. i am twice a widower.

3 days of prez and bird on wkcr august 27, 28, 29.

If built correctly, the mudslide should have no affect on a house's foundation. My house is built on a hillside (though not with those frightening pillars - they scare even me!) but it's built on concrete pilings that go down 40 feet into the bedrock. It's rock and not "mud," of course, but even if the hillside that our house was built on were to wash away, the house would still be standing on its foundation supports. Exactly what happened to my old house...before it burned in the Oakland Hills fire. having a home burn, losing a spouse or child, or a divorce. how on earth does one survive such and continue living?

inside rice, a forthright brilliant condy, serving no master, speaking as the real condy, 'bout art and things. in no way meant to be an expose of current or previous higherups.

So the solution to the problem of fast & easy money in the past is to make money fast & easy again? Cramer just didn't want to see his investment bank buddies lose their bonuses. i agree completely, but cramer is at least acknowledging the scope of the problem. From what I've seen, Cramer was exaggerating the scope of the problem. Guy we all pray that you are right.