A very poignant observation no matter what side you're on.
I agree with this.
Ok, Berigan. I see where you're coming from now.
(though I don't really totally agree with all of the statements made).
Will you at least try to?
Oh, yes! Of course!
I'm nearly always trying to get at subjects from the
"where did that idea come from?" angle.
Unfortunately, I'm constantly inundated with
statements that are - what we say here in Texas -
"flat out" statements...statements based on ideas that are
categories of thought rather than opinions/ideas that are
reasonably thought out.
...Or, if you wish, comments that are meant to have some weight,
but end up being a kind of "wink-wink, nudge-nudge" platitude that becomes
pretty all-encompassing without really saying anything of substance at all.
When I say that I don't agree totally with your statements,
I'm referring to the line that equates most of Che's views with most of our's here
and it simply isn't true. It's the all too typical activity of letting loose a convenient
platitude if an idea is to the left of Genghis Khan.
I couldn't really get a hold on Che's views about anything
(especially the anti-Semitic ones that I never read), because most of them appeared to be
highly ill-defined (which I don't believe that the majority of this board fits under -
no matter what our political, musical, etc views are).
What I mean is that I could never figure out where his light was shining from really:
was he out to just get a rise...this weird seesaw of a ride between being
"happy-happy joy-joy" one moment to getting weirdly defensive the next.
This "can't wait to bait" attitude mixed with a strange bi-polar weirdness
that made you wonder whether he really believed what he was saying.
So what you do is just listen and observe until you become his target
and try to, hopefully, deal with it as diplomatically as possible.